Evaluation of a primary care-based collaborative care model (PARTNERS2) for people with diagnoses of schizophrenia, bipolar, or other psychoses: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

Author:

Plappert Humera,Hobson-Merrett Charley,Gibbons Bliss,Baker Elina,Bevan Sheridan,Clark Michael,Creanor Siobhan,Davies Linda,Denyer Rebecca,Frost Julia,Gask Linda,Gibson John,Gill Laura,Gwernan-Jones Ruth,Hardy Pollyanna,Hosking Joanne,Huxley Peter,Jeffrey Alison,Jones Benjamin,Marwaha Steven,Pinold Vanessa,Planner Claire,Rawcliffe Tim,Reilly Siobhan,Richards Debra,Williams Lynsey,Birchwood Max,Byng Richard

Abstract

BackgroundCurrent NHS policy encourages an integrated approach to provision of mental and physical care for individuals with long term mental health problems. The ‘PARTNERS2’ complex intervention is designed to support individuals with psychosis in a primary care setting.AimThe trial will evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the PARTNERS2 intervention.Design & settingThis is a cluster randomised controlled superiority trial comparing collaborative care (PARTNERS2) with usual care, with an internal pilot to assess feasibility. The setting will be primary care within four trial recruitment areas: Birmingham & Solihull, Cornwall, Plymouth, and Somerset. GP practices are randomised 1:1 to either (a) the PARTNERS2 intervention plus modified standard care (‘intervention’); or (b) standard care only (‘control’).MethodPARTNERS2 is a flexible, general practice-based, person-centred, coaching-based intervention aimed at addressing mental health, physical health, and social care needs. Two hundred eligible individuals from 39 GP practices are taking part. They were recruited through identification from secondary and primary care databases. The primary hypothesis is quality of life (QOL). Secondary outcomes include: mental wellbeing, time use, recovery, and process of physical care. A process evaluation will assess fidelity of intervention delivery, test hypothesised mechanisms of action, and look for unintended consequences. An economic evaluation will estimate its cost-effectiveness. Intervention delivery and follow-up have been modified during the COVID-19 pandemic.ConclusionThe overarching aim is to establish the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the model for adults with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar, or other types of psychoses.

Publisher

Royal College of General Practitioners

Subject

Family Practice

Reference19 articles.

1. The Role of Primary Care in Service Provision for People with Severe Mental Illness in the United Kingdom

2. Organizing Care for Patients with Chronic Illness

3. Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis

4. Bora R (2012) Empowering people: coaching for mental health recovery (Rethink Mental Illness, London).

5. Pawson R Tilley N (1997) Realistic Evaluation (Sage Publications, London).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3