Point-of-care lactate testing for sepsis at presentation to health care: a systematic review of patient outcomes

Author:

Morris Elizabeth,McCartney David,Lasserson Daniel,Van den Bruel Ann,Fisher Rebecca,Hayward Gail

Abstract

BackgroundLactate is measured in hospital settings to identify patients with sepsis and severe infections, and to guide initiation of early treatment. Point-of-care technology could facilitate measurement of lactate by clinicians in the community. However, there has been little research into its utility in these environments.AimTo investigate the effect of using point-of-care lactate at presentation to health care on mortality and other clinical outcomes, in patients presenting with acute infections.Design and settingStudies comparing the use of point-of-care lactate to usual care in initial patient assessment at presentation to health care were identified using a maximally sensitive search strategy of six electronic databases.MethodTwo independent authors screened 3063 records for eligibility, and extracted data from eligible studies. Quality assessment for observational studies was performed using the ROBINS-I tool.ResultsEight studies were eligible for inclusion (3063 patients). Seven studies were recruited from emergency departments, and one from a pre-hospital aeromedical setting. Five studies demonstrated a trend towards reduced mortality with point-of-care lactate; three studies achieved statistical significance. One study demonstrated a significant reduction in length of hospital stay, although another did not find any significant difference. Two studies demonstrated a significant reduction in time to treatment for antibiotics and intravenous fluids.ConclusionThis review identifies an evidence gap — there is no high-quality evidence to support the use of point-of-care lactate in community settings. There are no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and no studies in primary care. RCT evidence from community settings is needed to evaluate this potentially beneficial diagnostic technology.

Publisher

Royal College of General Practitioners

Subject

Family Practice

Reference24 articles.

1. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)

2. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2016) Sepsis: recognition, diagnosis and early management. NG51 (NICE, London) https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/NG51 (accessed 9 Oct 2017).

3. The sepsis six and the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle: a prospective observational cohort study

4. Gilham C (2016) Sepsis: the primary care focus. Br J Gen Pract, https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X683905.

5. Society of Critical Care Medicine Surviving sepsis campaign, http://www.survivingsepsis.org/Pages/default.aspx (accessed 9 Oct 2017).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3