Author:
Morris Elizabeth,McCartney David,Lasserson Daniel,Van den Bruel Ann,Fisher Rebecca,Hayward Gail
Abstract
BackgroundLactate is measured in hospital settings to identify patients with sepsis and severe infections, and to guide initiation of early treatment. Point-of-care technology could facilitate measurement of lactate by clinicians in the community. However, there has been little research into its utility in these environments.AimTo investigate the effect of using point-of-care lactate at presentation to health care on mortality and other clinical outcomes, in patients presenting with acute infections.Design and settingStudies comparing the use of point-of-care lactate to usual care in initial patient assessment at presentation to health care were identified using a maximally sensitive search strategy of six electronic databases.MethodTwo independent authors screened 3063 records for eligibility, and extracted data from eligible studies. Quality assessment for observational studies was performed using the ROBINS-I tool.ResultsEight studies were eligible for inclusion (3063 patients). Seven studies were recruited from emergency departments, and one from a pre-hospital aeromedical setting. Five studies demonstrated a trend towards reduced mortality with point-of-care lactate; three studies achieved statistical significance. One study demonstrated a significant reduction in length of hospital stay, although another did not find any significant difference. Two studies demonstrated a significant reduction in time to treatment for antibiotics and intravenous fluids.ConclusionThis review identifies an evidence gap — there is no high-quality evidence to support the use of point-of-care lactate in community settings. There are no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and no studies in primary care. RCT evidence from community settings is needed to evaluate this potentially beneficial diagnostic technology.
Publisher
Royal College of General Practitioners
Reference24 articles.
1. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)
2. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2016) Sepsis: recognition, diagnosis and early management. NG51 (NICE, London) https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/NG51 (accessed 9 Oct 2017).
3. The sepsis six and the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle: a prospective observational cohort study
4. Gilham C (2016) Sepsis: the primary care focus. Br J Gen Pract, https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X683905.
5. Society of Critical Care Medicine Surviving sepsis campaign, http://www.survivingsepsis.org/Pages/default.aspx (accessed 9 Oct 2017).
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献