Understanding General Practitioners’ referral decisions for younger patients with symptoms of cancer: a qualitative interview study

Author:

di Martino Erica,Honey Stephanie,Bradley Stephen H,Ali Omer,Neal Richard,Scott Suzanne

Abstract

Background: As cancer incidence rises with age, some clinical guidelines include patient age as one of the criteria to decide whether they should be referred through the urgent suspected cancer (USC) pathway. Little is known on how strictly GPs adhere to these age criteria and what factors influence their referral decisions for younger patients. Aim: To understand GPs’ clinical decision making for younger patients with concerning symptoms who do not meet the age criteria for USC referral. Design and Setting: Qualitative study using in-depth semi-structured interviews with GPs working in surgeries across England (UK). Method: Participants (n=23) were asked to recall consultations with younger patients with cancer symptoms, describe factors influencing their clinical decisions, and discuss their overall attitude to age thresholds in cancer referral guidelines. A thematic analysis guided by Framework approach was employed to identify recurring themes. Results: GPs’ decision making regarding younger patients was influenced by several factors, including personal experiences, patient’s views and behaviour, level of clinical concern and ability to bypass system constraints. GPs weighted potential benefits and harms of a referral outside guidelines both on the patient and the health system. If clinical concern was high, GPs used their knowledge of local systems to ensure patients were investigated promptly even when not meeting age criteria. Conclusion: Whilst most GPs interpret age criteria flexibly and follow their own judgement and experience for clinical decisions regarding younger patients, system constraints may be a barrier to timely investigation.

Publisher

Royal College of General Practitioners

Subject

Family Practice

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3