Collaborative improvement in Scottish GP clusters after the Quality and Outcomes Framework: a qualitative study

Author:

Huang Huayi,Jefferson Emily R,Gotink Mark,Sinclair Carol,Mercer Stewart W,Guthrie Bruce

Abstract

BackgroundScotland abolished the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) in April 2016, before implementing a new Scottish GP contract in April 2018. Since 2016, groups of practices (GP clusters) have been incentivised to meet regularly to plan and organise quality improvement (QI) as part of this new direction in primary care policy.AimTo understand the organisation and perceived impact of GP clusters, including how they use quantitative data for improvement.Design and settingThematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders (n = 17) and observations of GP cluster meetings (n = 6) in two clusters.MethodThis analytical strategy was combined with a purposive (variation) sampling approach to the sources of data, to try to identify commonalities across diverse stakeholder experiences of working in or on the idea of GP clusters. Variation was sought particularly in terms of stakeholders’ level of involvement in improvement initiatives, and in their disciplinary affiliations.ResultsThere was uncertainty as to whether GP clusters should focus on activities generated internally or externally by the wider healthcare system (for example, from Scottish Health Boards), although the two observed clusters generally generated their own ideas and issues. Clusters operated with variable administrative/managerial and data support, and variable baseline leadership experience and QI skills. Qualitative approaches formed the focus of collaborative learning in cluster meetings, through sharing and discussion of member practices’ own understandings and experiences. Less evidence was observed of data analytics being championed in these meetings, partly because of barriers to accessing the analytics data and existing data quality.ConclusionCluster development would benefit from more consistent training and support for cluster leads in small-group facilitation, leadership, and QI expertise, and data analytics access and capacity. While GP clusters are up and running, their impact is likely to be limited without further investment in developing capacity in these areas.

Publisher

Royal College of General Practitioners

Subject

Family Practice

Reference39 articles.

1. How to get started in quality improvement

2. Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (2016) Quality Improvement — training for better outcomes, https://www.aomrc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Quality_improvement_training_better_outcomes_140316-2.pdf (accessed 15 Jul 2021).

3. Royal College of General Practitioners QI regional champions. https://www.rcgp.org.uk/clinical-and-research/our-programmes/quality-improvement/qi-regional-champions.aspx (accessed 15 Jul 2021).

4. Gosling J Mays N Erens B (2019) Quality improvement in general practice: what do GPs and practice managers think? https://www.health.org.uk/sites/default/files/upload/publications/2019/2019-THF-QI_GeneralPractice.pdf (accessed 15 Jul 2021).

5. The development of the Primary Care Clusters Multidimensional Assessment (PCCMA): A mixed-methods study

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3