Depression follow-up monitoring with the PHQ-9: an open cluster-randomised controlled trial

Author:

Kendrick TonyORCID,Dowrick ChristopherORCID,Lewis GlynORCID,Moore MichaelORCID,Leydon Geraldine MORCID,Geraghty Adam WAORCID,Griffiths GarethORCID,Zhu ShihuaORCID,Yao Guiqing LilyORCID,May CarlORCID,Gabbay MarkORCID,Dewar-Haggart RachelORCID,Williams SamanthaORCID,Bui LienORCID,Thompson NatalieORCID,Bridewell LaurenORCID,Trapasso EmiliaORCID,Patel TasneemORCID,McCarthy MollyORCID,Khan NailaORCID,Page HelenORCID,Corcoran EmmaORCID,Hahn Jane SungminORCID,Bird MollyORCID,Logan Mekeda XORCID,Ching Brian Chi FungORCID,Tiwari RiyaORCID,Hunt AnnaORCID,Stuart BethORCID

Abstract

BackgroundOutcome monitoring of depression treatment is recommended but there is a lack of evidence on patient benefit in primary care.AimTo test monitoring depression using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) with patient feedback.Design and settingAn open cluster-randomised controlled trial was undertaken in 141 group practices.MethodAdults with new depressive episodes were recruited through record searches and opportunistically. The exclusion criteria were as follows: dementia; psychosis; substance misuse; and suicide risk. The PHQ-9 was administered soon after diagnosis, and 10–35 days later. The primary outcome was the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) score at 12 weeks. The secondary outcomes were as follows: BDI-II at 26 weeks; Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) and EuroQol EQ-5D-5L quality of life at 12 and 26 weeks; antidepressant treatment; mental health and social service contacts; adverse events, and Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale (MISS) over 26 weeks.ResultsIn total, 302 patients were recruited to the intervention arm and 227 to the controls. At 12 weeks, 254 (84.1%) and 199 (87.7%) were followed-up, respectively. Only 40.9% of patients in the intervention had a GP follow-up PHQ-9 recorded. There was no significant difference in BDI-II score at 12 weeks (mean difference −0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI] = −2.16 to 1.26; adjusted for baseline depression, baseline anxiety, sociodemographic factors, and clustering by practice). EQ-5D-5L quality-of-life scores were higher in the intervention arm at 26 weeks (adjusted mean difference 0.053; 95% CI = 0.013 to 0.093. A clinically significant difference in depression at 26 weeks could not be ruled out. No significant differences were found in social functioning, adverse events, or satisfaction. In a per-protocol analysis, antidepressant use and mental health contacts were significantly greater in patients in the intervention arm with a recorded follow-up PHQ-9 (P= 0.025 andP= 0.010, respectively).ConclusionNo evidence was found of improved depression outcome at 12 weeks from monitoring. The findings of possible benefits over 26 weeks warrant replication, investigating possible mechanisms, preferably with automated delivery of monitoring and more instructive feedback.

Publisher

Royal College of General Practitioners

Reference23 articles.

1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2022) Depression in adults: treatment and management. NICE guideline [NG222], https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng222/chapter/Recommendations#recognition-and-assessment (accessed 20 March 2024).

2. Health Resources and Services Administration (2020) Uniform Data System Clinical Quality Measures, https://bphc.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/bphc/data-reporting/2020-clinical-measures-handout.pdf (accessed 20 March 2024).

3. Kaiser Permanente Mental health monitoring tool, https://wa-provider.kaiserpermanente.org/static/pdf/provider/patient-ed/screenings/bhi-monitoring-tool.pdf (accessed 20 March 2024).

4. Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap (Dutch Society of General Practitioners) (2019) NHG guideline on depression, https://richtlijnen.nhg.org/standaarden/depressie#volledige-tekst-3-beoordelen-van-de-ernst-van-de-depressieve-stoornis (accessed 20 March 2024).

5. Kendrick T El-Gohary M Stuart B (2016) Routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for improving treatment of common mental health disorders in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011119.pub2.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3