How can patients influence service improvement decision-making? a participatory research mixed methods study

Author:

Drinkwater JessicaORCID,MacFarlane AnneORCID,Twiddy Maureen,Meads David,Chadwick Ruth H.,Donnelly Ailsa,Gleeson Phil,Hayward Nick,Kelly Michael,Mir Robina,Prestwich Graham,Rathfelder Martin,Foy RobbieORCID

Abstract

Background: Health policy promotes patient participation in decision-making about service organisation. In English general practice this happens through contractually required patient participation groups (PPGs). However, there are problems with the enactment of PPGs which have not been systematically addressed. Aim: To observe how a co-designed theory-informed intervention can increase representational legitimacy and facilitate power-sharing to support PPGs to influence decision-making about general practice service improvement. Design and Setting: Participatory action research to implement the intervention in two general practices in the North of England. The intervention combined two different participatory practices; partnership working involving externally facilitated meetings with PPG members and staff, and consultation with the wider patient population using a bespoke discrete choice experiment (DCE). Method: To illustrate decision-making in PPGs qualitative data is presented from participant observation notes and photographed visual data generated through participatory methods. The DCE results are summarised to illustrate how wider population priorities contributed to overall decision-making. Observational data was thematically analysed using Normalisation Process Theory with support from a multi-stakeholder co-research group. Results: In both practices, patients influenced decision-making during PPG meetings and through the DCE, resulting in bespoke patient-centred action plans for service improvement. Power asymmetries were addressed through participatory methods, clarification of PPG roles in decision-making, and addressing representational legitimacy through wider survey consultation. Conclusion: Combining participatory practices and facilitated participatory methods enabled patients to influence decision-making about general practice service improvement. The policy of mandatory PPGs needs updating to recognise the need to resource participation in a meaningful way.

Publisher

Royal College of General Practitioners

Subject

Family Practice

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3