Cancer history as a predictor in cardiovascular risk scores: a primary care cohort study

Author:

Strongman HelenORCID,Herrett EmilyORCID,Jackson RodORCID,Sweeting MichaelORCID,Lyon Alexander RORCID,Stanway SusannahORCID,Lawson ClaireORCID,Kadam UmeshORCID,Smeeth LiamORCID,Bhaskaran KrishnanORCID

Abstract

BackgroundCardiovascular risks are raised in cancer survivors but cancer history is not included in cardiovascular risk scores that inform preventive decisions.AimTo assess whether cancer diagnosis should be included in cardiovascular risk scores.Design and settingCohort study using data from English general practices linked to hospital, cancer registration, and death registration data from 1990 to 2015.MethodAdults alive 1 year after a first cancer diagnosis and age, sex, general practice, and calendar- time matched cancer-free individuals were included. Individuals with <2 years of follow-up before index, recent statin prescriptions, or pre-existing coronary heart or cerebrovascular disease were excluded. Cox proportional hazard models used to develop QRISK3 scores were replicated with added cancer history variables. Whether independent hazard ratios for these variables met thresholds for inclusion in QRISK3 (>10% relative difference withP<0.01) was assessed.ResultsIn total, 81 420 cancer survivors and 413 547 cancer-free individuals were followed for a median 5.2 years (interquartile range [IQR] 2.8– 9.1) and 6.3 years (IQR 3.5–10.2), respectively. Including a 1-year cancer survivorship variable in a QRISK3-based model met the threshold for inclusion for males (independent hazard ratio [iHR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11 to 1.20,P<0.001) but not females (iHR 1.07, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.14,P= 0.02). When including cancer type, the threshold was met for both sexes with history of haematological cancer (males: iHR 1.27, 95% CI = 1.16 to 1.40,P<0.001; females: iHR 1.59, 95% CI = 1.32 to 1.91,P<0.001) and for males but not females with history of solid cancers (males: iHR 1.13, 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.18,P<0.001; females: iHR 1.04, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.10,P= 0.19).ConclusionDevelopers should consider including cancer history variables in future cardiovascular risk models.

Publisher

Royal College of General Practitioners

Subject

Family Practice

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3