Problem gamblers in primary care: can GPs do more?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Problem gamblers in primary care: can GPs do more?

Published:2011-04-01 Issue:585 Volume:61 Page:248-249
ISSN:0960-1643
Container-title:British Journal of General Practice
language:en
Short-container-title:Br J Gen Pract

Author:

Sanju George,Gerada Clare

Publisher

Royal College of General Practitioners

Subject

Family Practice

Reference12 articles.

1. Pathological gambling: a review of the literature (prepared for the American Psychiatric Association Task Force on DSM-IV Committee on disorders of impulse control not elsewhere classified);Lesieur;J Gambling Stud,1991

2. Wardle H Sproston K Orford J (2007) The British gambling prevalence survey 2007. (The Stationery Office, London).

3. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Committee on the Social and Economic Impact of Pathological Gambling (1999) Pathological gambling: a critical review (National Academy Press, Washington DC).

4. Health problems and medical utilization associated with gambling disorders: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on alcohol and related conditions;Morasco;Psychosom Med,2006

5. Comorbidity of DSM-IV pathological gambling and other psychiatric disorders: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions;Petry;J Clin Psychiat,2005

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Gambling treatment service providers’ views about contingency management: a thematic analysis;Harm Reduction Journal;2022-02-25

2. Perceptions of Interactive, Real-Time Persuasive Technology for Managing Online Gambling;Persuasive Technology;2022

3. Gambling problems in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Addiction Research & Theory;2021-02-04

4. An Examination of Clinician Responses to Problem Gambling in Community Mental Health Services;Journal of Clinical Medicine;2020-07-01

5. The diagnostic accuracy of brief screening instruments for problem gambling: A systematic review and meta-analysis;Clinical Psychology Review;2019-12