Supporting GPs around euthanasia requests from people with dementia: a qualitative analysis of Dutch nominal group meetings

Author:

Schuurmans Jaap,Vos Stephanie,Vissers Pim,Tilburgs Bram,Engels Yvonne

Abstract

BackgroundEuthanasia has been regulated by law under strict conditions in the Netherlands since 2002. Since then the number of euthanasia cases has constantly increased, and increased exponentially for patients with dementia (PWD). The number of euthanasia requests by such patients is even higher. Recently, an interview study showed that physicians who are confronted with a PWD’s euthanasia request experience problems with communication, pressure from relatives, patients, and society, workload, interpretation of the law, and ethical considerations. Moreover, if honoured, the physician and patient may interpret the right moment for euthanasia differently.AimTo identify ways of supporting GPs confronted with a PWD’s euthanasia request.Design and settingTwo expert nominal group meetings were organised with Dutch care physicians for older people, GPs, legal experts, a healthcare chaplain, a palliative care consultant, and a psychologist.MethodA total of 15 experts participated in the meetings. Both meetings were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using thematic analysis.ResultsFour themes emerged from the meetings: support provided by healthcare professionals, influencing public opinion, educational activities, and managing time and work pressure. The need for support was considered highest for GPs for all of these themes.ConclusionConsensus was reached with the help of experts on support needs for GPs confronted with euthanasia requests from PWD. A concise and clear explanation of the law is strongly desired. Changing public opinion seems the most challenging and a long-term aim. Communication training for finding the right balance between the physician’s professional responsibility and the patient’s autonomy should be made available, as a short-term aim.

Publisher

Royal College of General Practitioners

Subject

Family Practice

Reference54 articles.

1. Termination of Life on Request and Assisted Suicide Review Act Article 2, paragraph 2. [In Dutch]. http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0012410/2018-08-01 (accessed 21 Aug 2020).

2. General A Case number ECLI:NL:PHR: 2019: 1338. https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:PHR:2019:1338 (accessed 28 Sep 2020).

3. Would we rather lose our life than lose our self? Lessons from the Dutch debate on euthanasia for patients with dementia;Hertogh;Am J Bioeth,2007

4. Chabot B Never kill a defenceless person who does not realize. [In Dutch]. de Volkskrant, https://www.volkskrant.nl/columns-opinie/dood-nooit-weerloze-die-het-niet-beseft∼b96e0536/ (accessed 21 Aug 2020).

5. Euthanasia on the basis of a living will: old and new legal questions;den Hartogh;Nederlands Juristenblad,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3