Affiliation:
1. Schools History Project Fellow and Senior Lecturer, Leeds Trinity University, UK
Abstract
The concept of ‘powerful knowledge’ has become extremely influential in discussions about curriculum in England over the last ten years. However, the concept seems to have done little to revolutionise curriculum design, and in some cases it has led to curricular narrowing and a focus on an increasingly nationalistic narrative in history. Michael Young (2019, 2021) has argued that the failure of the concept of ‘powerful knowledge’ to underpin meaningful curriculum reforms has been mainly due to its misinterpretation and loose definition. This paper explores these claims and finds that key voices in education in England, and history education specifically, have misunderstood and misapplied the concept of powerful knowledge. However, it also makes the case that powerful knowledge cannot be meaningfully defined in terms of history education, and that attempts to make curricular decisions based on the concept are therefore a distraction from more meaningful curricular work.
Reference82 articles.
1. ‘Powerful knowledge and the curriculum: Contradictions and dichotomies’;P. Alderson;British Educational Research Journal,2019
2. ‘History lessons: Inequality, diversity and the national curriculum’;C. Alexander;Race Ethnicity and Education,2017
3. ‘Progression in historical understanding among students ages 7–14’;R. Ashby,2000
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献