Four design principles for student learning of substantive historical concepts – a realistic review study

Author:

Smets Wouter1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

Substantive historical concepts are an essential part of the history curriculum. In contrast to the use of meta-historical concepts, this aspect of historical thinking has received relatively little attention from educational scholars in recent years. This article draws on theory from cognitive developmental psychology, and seeks to apply this in the field of history didactics. In order to foster authoritative judgement in its application in history education, research evidence is synthesised. A realistic review methodology was used to conduct this synthesis. Four context-mechanism-outcome configurations were identified: (1) when working memory is overloaded, effective learning is impossible; (2) to acquire knowledge sustainably, it must be stored as a schema in long-term memory; (3) knowledge is learned more effectively when it builds on previously acquired knowledge; and (4) knowledge will gradually become more easily accessible for working memory. These context-mechanism-outcome configurations stimulate insight into, and long-term memory of, substantive historical concepts. Didactic design principles for teaching substantive historical concepts are proposed, and implications for history education are illustrated and discussed.

Publisher

UCL Press

Reference60 articles.

1. ‘A model of domain learning: Reinterpreting expertise as a multidimensional, multistage process’;Alexander PA Dai DY Sternberg RJ,2004

2. ‘Dialogic pedagogy at scale: Oblique perspectives’;Alexander R Resnick L Asterhan C Clarke S,2015

3. ‘Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes’;Atkinson RC Shiffrin RM Spence KW Spence JT,1968

4. ‘In defense of advance organizers: A reply to the critics’;Ausubel D;Review of Educational Research,1978

5. The Acquisition and Retention of Knowledge: A Cognitive View

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3