Turning the project of dictatorship into an example of democracy? Chances and risks of participation at the Nazi relic Prora

Author:

Rietmann Florian1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. PhD candidate, DFG Research Training Group 1913 ‘Cultural and Technological Significance of Historic Buildings’, Brandenburg University of Technology (BTU), Cottbus-Senftenberg, Germany

Abstract

This article explores a participatory process organised to deal with the highly contested former Nazi project Prora on the Baltic island of Rügen. It was carried out on behalf of the German government in 1996. The participatory process was an exceptional way of dealing with a heritage that remains difficult for Germany to this day. Key aspects shifted in Prora as a result of the procedure: away from the ideal of conscientious and careful conservation of the building as a memorial to past dictatorships and towards an active process of highlighting, rejecting and changing qualities of Prora for the construction of a new and alternative future. The main focus shifted from memory work to different present-day demands of the local population and the associated future scenarios for their island. The article argues that during the participatory process Prora was a real-life laboratory in which many things were tried out that were to become important pioneering approaches in heritage management over the next two decades. However, the participatory process in Prora is not only an impressive example of the potential that lies in such approaches; as an experiment it also points to new problems that are associated with them.

Publisher

UCL Press

Reference16 articles.

1. ‘A family vacation for workers: The strength through joy resorts at Prora’;Baranowski Shelley;German History,2007

2. ‘Zwölf Thesen zu Wirtschaftsumbau und Treuhandanstalt: Die Rolle(n) und Folgen des Wirkens der Treuhand nach dem Ende der DDR’ [Twelve theses on economic restructuring and the Treuhandanstalt: The role(s) and consequences of the work of the Treuhand after the end of the GDR];Böick Marcus,2022

3. ‘Vortrag Prof. H.-W. Hämer zum Auftakt des diskursiven Verfahrens für den weiteren Umgang mit Prora am 13. Mai 1996’ [Lecture by Prof. H.-W. Hämer at the start of the discursive process for the further handling of Prora on 13 May 1996], Attachment 7, in Protokoll der Auftaktveranstaltung am 13.5.1996 zum diskursiven Verfahren der STERN GmbH zur Liegenschaft Prora [Minutes of the opening event on 13 May 1996 on the discursive process of STERN GmbH regarding the Prora property], Günther Schlusche and Karin Rieckmann, 15 May 1996;Hämer Hardt-Waltherr

4. ‘Der Koloss von Rügen’ [The Colossus of Rügen];Hartung Klaus,1996

5. ‘Schiffswracks und Ostsee-Uni nach Prora? Studie der Stern GmbH scharf kritisiert’ [Shipwrecks and Baltic Sea University to Prora? Study by Stern GmbH sharply criticised];Luczak Thomas,1997

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3