Affiliation:
1. University of Newcastle, Australia
Abstract
The Ghanaian senior high-school history curriculum encourages teachers to guide students to explore, question and construct historical interpretations, rather than accept established historical narratives. This study investigates how those teachers conceive and implement the curriculum intent by exploring their pedagogical reasoning and classroom practices. The project described in this paper draws from a range of investigative instruments including in-depth interviews, classroom observations, post-lesson interviews and teachers’ planning paperwork from 15 public senior high schools in Ghana’s Central Region. This research found that teachers’ pedagogical reasoning was consistent with constructivist educational theory as well as responsive to the history curriculum, but that their stated understandings did not align with classroom practice. The findings indicate limited constructivist strategies in history lessons, as most teachers were didactic in approach and tended to teach history as a grand narrative.
Reference26 articles.
1. The Lure of Grand Narratives: A Dilemma for History Teachers
2. Teaching History for the Common Good
3. Teachers’ beliefs and implementation of historical literacy pedagogy in three advanced placement United States history classrooms;Bennett;The Georgia Social Studies Journal,2014
4. “Hard” facts or “soft” opinion? History teachers’ reasoning about historical objectivity;G Boadu;Journal of International Social Studies,2020
5. Explanation in history and the teaching of history;Burston;British Journal of Educational Studies,1954
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献