Meaningful public engagement in the context of open science: reflections from early and mid-career academics

Author:

Boon Wouter1,de Haan Judith2,Duisterwinkel Carien3,Gould Lauren4,Janssen Willem5,Jongsma Karin6,Milota Megan6,Radstake Maud2,Stevens Saskia4,Strick Madelijn7,Swinkels Marij5,van Mil Marc6,van Sebille Erik8,Wanders Niko1,Yerkes Mara A.7

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, The Netherlands

2. Open Science Programme, Utrecht University, The Netherlands

3. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands

4. Faculty of Humanities, Utrecht University, The Netherlands

5. Faculty of Law, Economics and Governance, Utrecht University, The Netherlands

6. University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands

7. Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, The Netherlands

8. Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, The Netherlands

Abstract

How is public engagement perceived to contribute to open science? This commentary highlights common reflections on this question from interviews with 12 public engagement fellows in Utrecht University’s Open Science Programme in the Netherlands. We identify four reasons why public engagement is an essential enabler of open science. Interaction between academics and society can: (1) better align science with the needs of society; (2) secure a relationship of trust between science and society; (3) increase the quality and impact of science; and (4) support the impact of open access and FAIR data practices (data which meet principles of findability, accessibility, interoperability and reusability). To be successful and sustainable, such public engagement requires support in skills training and a form of institutionalisation in a university-wide system, but, most of all, the fellows express the importance of a formal and informal recognition and rewards system. Our findings suggest that in order to make public engagement an integral part of open science, universities should invest in institutional support, create awareness, and stimulate dialogue among staff members on how to ‘do’ good public engagement.

Publisher

UCL Press

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference19 articles.

1. Understanding scientists’ willingness to engage;JC Besley;Science Communication,2018

2. Science communication and science in society: A conceptual review in ten keywords;M Bucchi;Tecnoscienza,2016

3. QUAGOL: A guide for qualitative data analysis;B Dierckx de Casterlé;International Journal of Nursing Studies,2012

4. Editorial: Engagement for change;S Duncan;Research for All,2021

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3