Abstract
This research endeavors to delve into the qualitative research method of deconstruction and its profound application in deciphering the nuanced meanings within historical texts. Utilizing a review methodology, this study takes the form of a comprehensive review article. Deconstruction, as both a theory and practical approach to text reading, challenges the prevailing notion that language systems inherently establish coherence or unity in literary texts, aiming to uncover definitive meanings. The primary objective of deconstruction is to express concepts qualitatively and analytically. Research questions are tailored to the type of text under consideration, guided by the researcher's decisions. For instance, the groundbreaking concept of "explanatory and inquiry" emerged in the literary domain, maintaining its relevance within academic institutions and expanding to encompass various conceptual frameworks. Deconstruction extends its reach into social thinking and speeches, involving critical re-examination of historical texts to glean insights into historical facts. Essentially akin to metaphysical criticism, the deconstruction method was founded by Jacques Derrida, an Algerian philosopher of French origin, whose theories significantly influenced postmodern philosophy and literary criticism.
Reference16 articles.
1. Borradori, G. (2003). Philosophy in a Time of Terror. Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida. Chicago and London. The University of Chicago Press.
2. Creswell, J. V. (2017). 30 Essential Skills that Qualitative Researchers Should Know. Translation: Yazdani, Hamid Reza, Mohammadi, Fatemeh. Tehran: Negha Danesh.
3. Critchley, S. (1999). The Ethics of Deconstruction: Derrida and Levinas, 2nd ed. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.
4. Derrida, J. (2010). Grammatology. (M. Parsa, Trans.) Tehran: new event.
5. Derrida, J. (1973). “Difference” in Speech and Phenomena, trans. D.B. Allison. Northwestern University Press.