Abstract
‘Gaslighting’ describes a form of manipulation that induces doubt in someone’s perceptions, experiences, understanding of events or conception of reality in general. But what kind of doubt is it? How do ‘ordinary’ epistemic doubts differ from those doubts that can lead to despair and the feeling of losing one’s mind? The phenomenon of ‘gaslighting’ has been attracting public attention for some time and has recently found its way into philosophical reflections that address moral, sexist and epistemic aspects of gaslighting. Little has been said, however, about the nature of gaslighting-induced doubts themselves, how they differ from ordinary, even ‘reasonable’ epistemic (self-) doubts and how it can come to someone doubting their own perception and conception of reality in the first place. The aim of this paper is to shed some light on these aspects by drawing on some of Wittgenstein’s remarks on doubt, published mainly in On Certainty. To this end, I will first outline the phenomenon of gaslighting as an epistemic injustice before presenting Wittgenstein’s reflections on doubt(ing). These will then be applied to the phenomenon of gaslighting, with a more specific focus on the evocation of such fundamental self-doubt in successful gaslighting, again drawing on some of Wittgenstein’s remarks.
Publisher
University of Bergen Library
Reference36 articles.
1. Abramson, K., 2014. “Turning Up the Lights on Gaslighting”. In: Philosophical Perspectives 28, 1-30.
2. Anonymous, 2016. “Gaslighting – Subtiler Missbrauch”. In: kleinergast, www.kleinerdrei.org, accessed: 28 December 2021.
3. APA Dictionary of Psychology, American Psychology Association, ed., https://dictionary.apa.org, accessed: 17 December 2021.
4. Calef V. & E. Weinshel, 1981. “Some Clinical Consequences of Introjection: Gaslighting”. In: Psychoanalytic Quaterly 50, 44-66.
5. Catapang Podosky, P., 2021. “Gaslighting, First- and Second-Order”. In: Hypathia 36, 207-227.