Tree-structured readings of the Tractatus

Author:

Stern David G

Abstract

I argue that the numbering system of the Tractatus lets us see how it was constructed, in two closely related senses of that term. First, it tells us a great deal about the genesis of the book, for the numbering system was used to assemble and rearrange a series of drafts, as recorded in MS 104. Second, it helps us understand the structure of the published book, as cryptically summarized in the opening footnote. I also discuss an unpublished letter from Anscombe to von Wright from 1948 which contains the very first sketch of a tree-structured reading, and what I believe is Stenius’s response to Anscombe’s proposal. The paper critically evaluates previous work on tree-structured readings and contends that we need to read the Tractatus in both the number order used in the published book and the tree order that Wittgenstein used to draft it. It also considers some of the main ways of turning this complex branching structure into a linear, printed text, and so serves as an introduction to the three tree-structured editions of the Tractatus that accompany this paper (the German text, and the translations by Ogden/Ramsey and Pears & McGuinness).

Publisher

University of Bergen Library

Subject

Philosophy

Reference57 articles.

1. Anscombe, G. E. M. 1959 An Introduction to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

2. Bazzocchi, Luciano 2005 “The strange case of the Prototractatus note”. In Friedrich Stadler and Michael Stöltzner (eds.) Time and History, Papers of the 28th International Wittgenstein Symposium, 24–26. Kirchberg am Wechsel.

3. Bazzocchi, Luciano 2007 “A database for a Prototractatus Structural Analysis and the Hypertext Version of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus”. In H. Hrachovec, A. Pichler, J. Wang (eds.) Philosophy of The Information Society, Papers of the 30th International Wittgenstein Symposium. 18–20. Kirchberg am Wechsel.

4. Bazzocchi, Luciano 2010 “The Prototractatus Manuscript and its Corrections.” In N. Venturinha (ed.), Wittgenstein after his Nachlass, 11–29. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.

5. Bazzocchi, Luciano 2010a: “Trees, Levels and Ladders”. In: V. Munz, K. Puhl, J. Wang (eds.): Language and World. Part One. Essays on the Philosophy of Wittgenstein, Heusenstamm: ontos verlag, pp. 329–341.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3