Affiliation:
1. Universidad de Valladolid
2. Universidade da Beira Interior
Abstract
Transparency in the media has become a fundamental pillar within all democratic societies, as a mechanism for reinforcing government regulation (Anderson, 2009) and citizen trust in institutions (Vos and Craft, 2016). Journalism, which has traditionally acted as a watchdog and a check on power, is now in the midst of a credibility crisis, compounded by polarization and the rise of disinformation. For this reason, various studies advocate that media outlets, just like institutions and governments, should use transparency mechanisms that allow them to respond directly or indirectly to society regarding the content they publish, as an exercise of responsibility. This research aims to evaluate media transparency in the Spanish–Portuguese landscape by means of an index that includes variables studied in the theoretical framework and that come from legislative, academic, and professional sources. These variables have been used to measure corporate and financial transparency, transparency in content production, openness to public participation, and the self-regulation mechanisms of ten media outlets in Spain and Portugal. This study concluded that, with only 43% adherence to the transparency variables analyzed, promoting accountability is still a work in progress for media outlets, and it must be stepped up at both the academic and professional levels.
Publisher
Ediciones Profesionales de la Informacion SL
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems,General Medicine
Reference75 articles.
1. Aguaded, Ignacio; Romero-Rodríguez, Luis (2015). “Mediamorfosis y desinformación en la infoesfera: alfabetización mediática, digital e informacional ante los cambios de hábitos de consumo informativo”. Education in the knowledge society, v. 16, n. 1, pp. 44-57. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks20151614457
2. Alonso-López, Nàdia; Terol-Bolinches, Raúl (2021). “La herramienta de transparencia en las noticias sobre la covid-19 publicadas por el diario Público durante los primeros 14 días del estado de alarma”. Hipertext.net, n. 22, pp. 51-62. https://doi.org/10.31009/hipertext.net.2021.i22.05
3. Amazeen, Michelle A. (2020). “Journalistic interventions: The structural factors affecting the global emergence of fact-checking”. Journalism, v. 21, n. 1, pp. 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917730217
4. Amorós-García, Marc (2019). “Los medios de comunicación contra las noticias falsas: todo es falso, ¿salvo el periodismo?”. Cuadernos de periodistas: revista de la Asociación de la Prensa de Madrid, v. 38, pp. 21-41. https://www.cuadernosdeperiodistas.com/media/2019/09/21_40_Marc-Amoros.pdf
5. Andersen, Thomas-Barnebeck (2009). “E-government as an anti-corruption strategy”. Information economics and policy, v. 21, n. 3, pp. 201-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.11.003
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献