Consumption of information and citizen’s perception of the sources consulted during the Covid-19 pandemic: A study of the situation based on opinion polls

Author:

Quian Alberto1ORCID,Elías Carlos2ORCID,Soengas-Pérez Xosé1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

2. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid

Abstract

The aim of this cross-sectional study is to analyze the consumption of information about coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Spain and to ascertain the public’s perception of the role of journalists, the media, the scientific community, and governmental and health authorities. The methodology involved taking a descriptive survey of a sample of 1,800 people who were representative of the Spanish population, were of legal age, and were residents of the 17 autonomous communities, between June 6 and 22, 2022. Age, political leaning, attitude toward vaccines, and level of education were determining variables. The results show that ideology and age are the factors that most condition the use of different types of information sources. Centrists consume more traditional media than those on the political left or right, who are the least likely to obtain their information from traditional media. And left-wingers rely more on official sources, such as health authorities, in contrast to centrists or right-wingers. Anti-vaccinationists (anti-vaxxers) prefer alternative sources. Meanwhile, the use of sources does not differ between men and women. Their consumption behavior is similar, which shows that gender is not a variable that significantly influences information consumption, neither in the selection of sources nor in the perception of the role of science and journalism. In general, the main sources of information consulted during the COVID-19 pandemic were the traditional media and the health authorities. In the context of the pandemic, young people consumed the least information and expressed the greatest distrust in journalism and science.

Publisher

Ediciones Profesionales de la Informacion SL

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems,Communication,General Medicine

Reference56 articles.

1. Allum, Nick; Sturgis, Patrick; Tabourazi, Dimitra; Brunton-Smith, Ian (2008). “Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis”. Public understanding of science, v. 17, n. 1, pp. 35-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506070159

2. Bernal-Triviño, Ana (2020). “Habits and feelings regarding Covid-19 news coverage during lockdown in Spain”. Tripodos, n. 49, pp. 169-183. https://doi.org/10.51698/tripodos.2020.49p169-183

3. Briones, Rowena; Nan, Xiaoli; Madden, Kelly; Waks, Leah (2012). “When vaccines go viral: an analysis of HPV vaccine coverage on YouTube”. Health communication, v. 27, n. 5, pp. 478-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.610258

4. Calisher, Charles; Carroll, Dennis; Colwell, Rita; Corley, Ronald B.; Daszak, Peter; Drosten, Christian; Enjuanes, Luis; Farrar, Jeremy; Field, Hume; Golding, Josie; Gorbalenya, Alexander; Haagmans, Bart; Hughes, James M.; Karesh, William B.; Keusch, Gerald T.; Lam, Sai-Kit; Lubroth, Juan; Mackenzie, John S.; Madoff, Larry; Mazet, Jonna; Palese, Peter; Perlman, Stanley; Poon, Leo; Roizman, Bernard; Saif, Linda; Subbarao, Kanta; Turner, Mike (2020). “Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting Covid-19”. The lancet, v. 395, n. 10226, pp. e42-e43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30418-9

5. Casero-Ripollés, Andreu; Doménech-Fabregat, Hugo; Alonso-Muñoz, Laura (2023). “Percepciones de la ciudadanía española ante la desinformación en tiempos de la Covid-19”. Icono 14, v. 21, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v21i1.1988

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Investigación sobre comunicación en COVID-19 y principales hallazgos;REVISTA ESPAÑOLA DE COMUNICACIÓN EN SALUD;2024-01-06

2. Audiences for the Journalism of the Third Millennium;Journalism, Digital Media and the Fourth Industrial Revolution;2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3