Affiliation:
1. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
Abstract
Numerous studies have analyzed the reading habits of university students, demonstrating the benefits of voluntary reading for academic performance. It is thus paradoxical that a large fraction of university students only read instrumentally and are far from adopting stable reading habits. This general situation is repeated among future professionals in the education field, whose personal reading experiences have been proven to have a decisive influence on their training and professional practice. Students on information and documentation degree courses are among the group of future professionals who are strongly linked to reading and who must attain competence in reading and comprehension. The main aim of this study is to use a sample of 214 students on information and documentation degree courses at five Spanish universities to analyze the professional profiles of most interest to them and their relationship with reading, both at a global level and depending on their chosen profile. The results reveal that many students have not identified a clearly defined professional profile. We also confirm findings from other studies on reading habits and behaviors, where it is evident that voluntary reading is not part of their lifestyle, albeit with some differences here between students depending on the professional profile selected. These results support the idea that, although some of these competences do not seem to have a strictly information or documentation nature, given the importance given to them in professional opportunities related to these studies, their reinforcement should be considered in future revisions of such degrees.
Publisher
Ediciones Profesionales de la Informacion SL
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems,General Medicine
Reference60 articles.
1. Abadal, Ernest; Rubió, Anna (2017). “Evolución de los perfiles ocupacionales de los profesionales de la información”. Anuario ThinkEPI, v. 11, pp. 58-62. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2017.06
2. Anderson, Rick (2017). “Fake news and alternative facts: Five challenges for academic libraries”. Insights, v. 30, n. 2, pp. 4-9. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.356
3. Aneca (2004). Libro blanco. Título de grado en información y documentación. Madrid: Agencia Nacional de Evaluación de la Calidad y Acreditación. http://www.aneca.es/media/150424/libroblanco_jun05_documentacion.pdf
4. Applegate, Anthony J.; Applegate, Mary-Dekonty (2004). “The Peter Effect: Reading habits and attitudes of preservice teachers”. The reading teacher, v. 57, n. 6, pp. 554-563. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20205399
5. Artaza, Carlos-Hugo (2011). “El mercado laboral de los titulados en Biblioteconomía y Documentación: análisis de las ofertas de empleo publicadas en IweTel durante el período 2000-2007”. Biblios, n. 44. https://doi.org/10.5195/biblios.2011.13
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献