Abstract
The medical information (MI) function within the pharmaceutical industry plays a significant role in the provision of scientific answers for patients and healthcare professionals. The purpose of this study is to identify the current structure, organization, and functions of MI departments in Spain. Sixty local and international pharmaceutical companies based in Spain were invited to participate in this study between May and July 2019. An online 34–item questionnaire developed by the AMIFE MI Working Group was distributed to the companies. Data were analyzed through descriptive statistics using response frequencies. A total of 44 responses from 60 surveys (73%) were received. More than half of the respondents were employed in international companies based in Europe (57%, n = 25). Seventy-one percent (n = 31) of the companies had 100 to 1,000 employees in Spain. Most respondents declared that they had an MI department in their company (73%, n = 32), with most (53%) having two to five employees working on MI. Most MI (n = 50) specialists had a biomedical academic degree (predominantly pharmacy, biology, and medicine). MI departments were involved in many functions, the most common being answering enquiries (100%), handling drug information requests (97%), preparing written responses (94%), and literature services for external use (77%). The mean annual volume of MI enquiries was 2,301 (median 1,100). The results of this survey contribute to a better understanding of MI departments in Spanish pharmaceutical companies, as well as their functions and responsibilities, and could help identify opportunities and areas for improvement.
Publisher
Ediciones Profesionales de la Informacion SL
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems
Reference27 articles.
1. Albano, Dominick; Soloff, Allison; Heim, Katelyn; Mavila, Sudeep (2016). “A theory on the relativity of factors impacting the utilization of medical information services from the pharmaceutical industry”. Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, v. 50, n. 5, pp. 554-559. https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479016640019
2. Best Practices; LLC’s Research; Advisory Services (2018). Medical information excellence: building capabilities for better internal & external communication. White paper. Chapel Hill.
3. Bonk, Lisa; Kothari, Madhuri; Andrikanich, Alyson-Sous; Yang, Ellen (2012). “The role of pharmaceutical medical information in promotional review: three benchmarking surveys”. Drug information journal, v. 46, n. 1, pp. 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092861511427873
4. Bordoloi, Poonam; Gažo, Andrew; Savulich, Donna; Verzosa, Conrad (2014). “Medical information services: How are we trending?”. Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, v. 48, n. 6, pp. NP15-NP21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479014546334
5. EFPIA (2019). EFPIA HCP Code. EFPIA code on the promotion of prescription-only medicines to, and interactions with, health-care professionals. General Assembly Consolidated Final. EFPIA; 2019. Final consolidated version; 2019. June 27 final editing, pp. 1-59. European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations. https://www.efpia.eu/media/554677/efpia_codes_a5_v3-2021_sm.pdf