Indicadores de medición del acceso abierto: fuentes y herramientas

Author:

Borrego Ángel1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universitat de Barcelona

Abstract

Determining the percentage of open access publications available is the most pragmatic indicator for measuring the concreteness of open science policies and can be found in most plans in this field. This note offers a review of the literature published in the last decade about the evolution of open access to the scientific literature and the analysis of open access indicators developed in different countries. The results show that, when creating an open access indicator, it is necessary to make decisions regarding the collection of documents on which the calculation will be carried out, the tool that will be used to determine the availability of open access documents, the definition and typologies of open access being studied, the possible inclusion of additional sources of information, aspects related to timing, and the publication of the documentation necessary to guarantee the reproducibility of the indicator.

Publisher

Ediciones Profesionales de la Informacion SL

Subject

General Medicine

Reference20 articles.

1. Archambault, Éric; Amyot, Didier; Deschamps, Philippe; Nicol, Aurore; Provencher, Françoise; Rebout, Lise; Roberge, Guillaume (2014). Proportion of open access papers published in peer-reviewed journals at the European and world levels—1996–2013. European Commision. https://science-metrix.com/sites/default/files/science-metrix/publications/d_1.8_sm_ec_dg-rtd_proportion_oa_1996-2013_v11p.pdf

2. Basson, Isabel; Simard, Marc-André; Ouangré, Zoé-Aubierge; Sugimoto, Cassidy R.; Larivière, Vincent (2022). “The effect of data sources on the measurement of open access: A comparison of Dimensions and the Web of Science”. PLoS one, v. 17, n. 3, e0265545. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265545

3. Bosman, Jeroen; Kramer, Bianca (2018). “Open access levels: a quantitative exploration using Web of Science and oaDOI data”. PeerJ preprints, v. 6, e3520v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3520v1

4. Else, Holly (2018). “How Unpaywall is transforming open science”. Nature, v. 560, pp. 291-292. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05968-3

5. European Commission (2021). Monitoring the open access policy of Horizon 2020. https://doi.org/10.2777/268348

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Open access: a journey from impossible to probable, but still uncertain;El Profesional de la información;2023-01-17

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3