Abstract
By investigating into collective bargaining in Austria, we show that bargaining - two opposing parties negotiating a deal - may take the form of a temporal organization and further, that outcomes of bargaining may significantly be affected by this. We specifically analyze the hierarchy, structure, membership, common goal and common identity of the bargaining organization, as well as its temporal and rhythmic nature. Together this establishes a temporal organization in contrast to bargaining between clearly separated parties. We discuss this as a possible explanation for the widely acknowledged success of the Austrian “Sozialpartnerschaft”.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Social Psychology
Reference39 articles.
1. Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2008). Meta-Organization. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
2. Aidt, T. S., & Sena, V. (2005). Unions : Rent Creators or Extractors? Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 107(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2005.00397.x
3. Arbeiterkammer (2011): Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Taschenbuch 2011. AK Österreich
4. Bairstow, F. (1980). The structure of bargaining: International comparisons - a story of diversity. Labor Law Journal, 514–525.
5. Bakker, R. M. (2010). Taking Stock of Temporary Organizational Forms: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 466–486. JOUR. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00281.x