Author:
Kuna Danijela,Babić Matej,Očić Mateja
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to examine the structure of an expert model of exercises designed to eliminate the Lack of specific ski movement mistake in short ski turn, as well as offer a hierarchical classification of the expert model. For this purpose, a two-stage research was conducted. During the first stage of the research the exercises with the purpose of Lack of specific ski movement mistake elimination were designed by 20 skiing experts aged 25 to 45. By means of email and coordinated by the paper author, the experts first designed a model of 14 methodical exercises and subsequently selected the five most relevant ones, ranking them on a scale from 1 to 5. A nonparametric chi - square test (χ2) was used. The research showed there was no significant variation across the experts’eval-uation of the five most important methodical exercises (χ2 = 21,69; p = 0,06). The expert model of the most important methodical exercises for the Lack of specific ski movement mistake correction thus includes the following: Holding a ski stick under the handle, Jump turns, Hands on hips, Unbuttoned ski boots and Ski poles in vertical position in forwards. 307 skiing professionals of various levels of expertise participated in the second stage of the research, whose aim was to classify the Lack of specific ski movement mistake elimi-nation exercises. The participants’task was to rank the exercises based on their relevance. Total amounts of rank sums (ΣR) were calculated, the Kruskal-Wallis test (H-test) was car-ried out, and the corresponding levels of significance (p) were recorded, for the purpose of comparing the significance of diversity between rank sums and the expert model. The sta-tistically significant difference was found between the rank sums (ΣR) of the most eficient exercises for the Lack of specific ski movement mistake correction (H = 198,19; p < 0,001). The results obtained in the two stages of the research provide valuable insights regarding the methods of short ski turns. The hierarchical classification of the most important method-ical corrective exercises obtained from ski teachers and professionals with different levels of education and expertise yields accurate and precise data about corrective methodical exercises in the process of studying short ski turn. Any further research regarding the same object should evaluate the designed expert model of the most important methodical exer-cises, as well as their hierarchical classification, across different groups of participants.
Reference19 articles.
1. Anderson David (2007). Ski school. United Kingdom. Published by New Holland Publishers Ltd. Černohorski, B. & Pustovrh, J. (2008). Expert model for the evaluation of potential competition performance in Cross-country skiers exemplified by two evaluated athletes. Biology of Sport. 25(3), 211-232
2. Decroix, M., Wazir. N. R., Zeuwtsa, L., Frederik Deconincka, F. J. A., Lenoira, M. & Vansteenkistea, P. (2017). Expert - Non-expert differences in visual behaviour during alpine slalom skiing. Human Movement Science, 55, 229-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2017.08.012
3. Lešnik, B., & Žvan, M. (2010). A turn to move on - Alpine skiing - Slovenian way. Theory and methodology of alpine skiing; SZS - Združenje učiteljev in trenerjev smučanja
4. Emeterio, C., & González-Badillo, J. (2010). The physical and anthropometric profiles of adolescent alpine skiers and their relationship with sporting rank. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24(4), 1007-1012. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cbabb5
5. Falda-Buscaiot, T., Hintzy, F., Rougier, P., Lacouture, P., & Coulmy, N. (2017). Influence of slope steepness, foot position and turn phase on plantar pressure distribution during giant slalom alpine ski racing. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176975