Online Dispute Resolution to Resolve Consumer Disputes from the Perspective of European Union Law: Is the Potential of ODR Fully Used?

Author:

Loutocký Pavel

Abstract

Traditional judicial mechanisms did not offer an adequate solution for cross-border electronic commerce disputes. Although there has been expected great potential in solving disputes online and the rise of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) use, the assumptions has not been confirmed yet. Only a few examples demonstrate the success stories of ODR, which is in big contrast to the continuous growth of electronic transactions and in general with the use of the online environment. The European Commission however understood the potential of ODR and it is trying to foster the use of it by adopting the ODR Regulation and the ADR Directive. Such legal framework has been developed to apply in consumer disputes arising out of sales or providing services between an EU consumer and an EU trader.The ADR Directive sets out basic standards of ADR entities and processual rules under which it is possible to solve the dispute. Then under the ODR Regulation the complainant will be able to submit a complaint using the ODR platform. The complaint (and any related documentation) will be submitted to the ODR platform via an electronic form.Yet it is necessary to assess the risks of above mentioned legal framework. One of the great concerns are connected with possible forum shopping while providers are registering as ADR entities. Experienced trader (unlike the consumer) is able to choose ADR provider, which is more likely to decide in his favour. Possible exclusion of online negotiation or even online tools in general is then further underlining possible. The paper will thus assess main legal aspects of ADR / ODR legal framework of European Union Law and will deal with main problematic parts of it.

Publisher

Masaryk University Press

Subject

Law,Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications

Reference23 articles.

1. [1] BOGDAN, Michael. The New EU Regulation on Online Resolution for Consumer Disputes. Masaryk University Journal for Law and Technology, 9 (1) 2015.

2. [2] CORTÉS, Pablo and Arno R. LODDER. Consumer Dispute Resolution Goes Online: Reflections on the Evolution of European Law for Out-of-Court Redress. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law (MJ). 21 (1) 2014.

3. [3] CORTÉS, Pablo. Enforcing EU Consumer Policy Through Different Layers: Combining the Judicial and the Out-of-Court Mechanisms [online]. University of Leicester School of Law Research Paper No. 14-27. Available at: .

4. [4] CORTÉS, Pablo. European Union’s initiatives on ADR and ODR. Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, 21 (8) 2015.

5. [5] CORTÉS, Pablo. The impact of EU law in the ADR landscape in Italy, Spain and the UK: time for change or missed opportunity? ERA Forum, 16 (2) 2015.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3