To Post, or Not to Post – That Is the Question: Employee Monitoring and Employees’ Right to Data Protection

Author:

Lukács Adrienn

Abstract

Nowadays social media have a growing importance in several areas of our lives. They are used for numerous objectives: self-expression, keeping in touch with acquaintances, communication or obtaining information about the latest events and news. During their use the individual shares a significant amount of personal data. This conduct can have serious implications for employment. The (prospective) employer is interested in the surveillance of these sites for several reasons, as he/she can easily gain insight into the individual’s private life and obtain, without costs, detailed information about him/her. The legal problem arising is that the employee’s fundamental rights – namely the right to privacy and the right to data protection – collide with the employer’s legitimate interests.The aim of the paper is to highlight the different rights and interests present on the two sides of the parties in the employment relationship; focusing on the employee’s right to data protection and on the employer’s legitimate interests in monitoring employees. As a result of the paper, I will draw attention to the legal problems lying behind social network background checks and monitoring. I will provide recommendations on how users and employers can continue using these sites while still preserving privacy.

Publisher

Masaryk University Press

Subject

Law,Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications

Reference63 articles.

1. [1] 30th International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners (2008), Resolution on Privacy Protection in Social Network Services. Strasbourg, 17 October 2008.

2. [2] Abril, P. S., Levin, A. and Del Riego, A. (2012) Blurred Boundaries: Social Media Privacy and the Twenty-First-Century Employee. American Business Law Journal, 49 (1), pp. 63–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1714.2011.01127.x

3. [3] Anderson, D. R. (2011) Restricting Social Graces: The Implications of Social Media for Restrictive Covenants in Employment Contracts. Ohio State Law Journal, 72 (4), pp. 881–908.

4. [4] Article 29 Data Protection Working Party (2001) Opinion 8/2001 on the Processing of Personal Data in the Employment Context, 5062/01/EN/Final WP 48, 13 September.

5. [5] Article 29 Data Protection Working Party (2002) Working document on the surveillance of electronic communications in the workplace, 5401/01/EN/Final WP 55, 29 May.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3