Author:
Swierczynski Marek,Żarnowiec Łukasz
Abstract
The authors examine the problem of the law applicable to liability for damages due to traffic accidents involving autonomous vehicles. Existing conflict-of-laws regulation adopted in the Rome II Regulation and both Hague Conventions of 1971 and 1973 is criticized. Upon examination of these legal instruments, it becomes clear that existing regulation is very complex and complicated. In effect authors recommend revisions to the legal framework. Proposed solutions are balanced and take into consideration both the interests of the injured persons, as well the persons claimed to be liable. New approach allows for more individual consideration of specific cases and direct to better outcome of the disputes. The findings may be useful in handling the cases related to use of algorithms of artificial intelligence in private international law.
Subject
Law,Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications
Reference44 articles.
1. [1] Basedow, J. et al. (2003) Hamburg Group for Private International Law, Comments on the European Commission's Draft Proposal for a Council Regulation on the Law Applicable to Non-Contractual Obligations. Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, 67.
2. [2] Brożek, B. (2017) The Troublesome 'Person'. In: V. Kurki and T. Pietrzykowski (eds.). Legal Personhood: Animals, Artificial Intelligence and the Unborn. Cham.
3. [3] Cassart, A. (2017) Aéronefs sans pilote, voitures sans conducteur: la destination plus importante que le voyage. In: H. Jacquemin, A. De Streel (eds.). L'intelligence artificielle et le droit. Bruxelles.
4. [4] Czepelak, M. (2015) Autonomia woli w prawie prywatnym międzynarodowym Unii Europejskiej. Warszawa.
5. [5] Dickinson, A. (2008) The Rome II Regulation: The law applicable to non-contractual obligations. Oxford.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献