"A Robot Is Watching You”: Humanoid Robots And The Different Impacts On Privacy

Author:

Cardiell Lucas

Abstract

Robots, particularly the ones that belong to a special type of robotic technologies designed and deployed for communicating and interacting with humans, slip into more and more domains of human life - from the research laboratories and operating rooms to our kitchens, bedrooms, and offices. They can interact with humans with facial expressions, gaze directions, and voices, mimicking the affective dynamics of human relationships. As a result, they create new opportunities, but also new challenges and risks to peoples’ privacy.  The literature on privacy issues in the context of Social Companion Robots (SCRs) is poor and has a strong focus on information privacy and data protection. It has given, however, less attention to other dimensions of privacy, e.g. physical, emotional, or social privacy. This article argues for an “evolving” or “transformable” notion of privacy, as opposed to the “elusive” concept of privacy elaborated by leading privacy theorists such as Daniel J. Solove (2008) and Judith J. Thomson (1975). In other words, rather than assuming that privacy has a single core or definition (as defined, e.g., in Warren and Brandeis' 1890 paper), it maintains that it is important to conceptualize privacy as distinguishable into various aspects, including informational privacy, the privacy of thoughts and actions, and social privacy. This inductive approach makes it possible to identify new dimensions of privacy and therefore effectively respond to the rapid technological evolution in AI technologies which is constantly introducing new spheres of privacy intrusions.

Publisher

Masaryk University Press

Subject

Law,Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications

Reference39 articles.

1. [1] Allen, L, A (2011) Unpopular Privacy: What Must We Hide? New York: Oxford University Press.

2. [2] Aristotle (1944) in 23 Volumes, Vol. 21, translated by H. Rackham. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press; London, William Heinemann Ltd.

3. [3] Asimov, I (1950) Liar. In Astounding Science Fiction, Reprinted in "I, Robot".

4. [4] Balkin, J. M. (2016) Information Fiduciaries and the First Amendment. UC Davis Law Review. Vol. 49, No. 4.

5. [5] Bekey, G (2017) Autonomous Robots: From Biological Inspiration to Implementation and Control. Paperback

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Open-Sourcing a Humanoid Robot;Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems;2024

2. The Robot and Human Futures: Visualising Autonomy in Law and Science Fiction;Law and Critique;2023-09-29

3. Using a Knowledge Café approach as a public engagement activity for raising awareness of data protection issues in robotics for health and social care;Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems;2023-07-11

4. Household Social Robots − Special Issues Relating to Data Protection;Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Legal Studies;2022-06-15

5. The Robotisation of Tax Administration;Biosystems & Biorobotics;2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3