Author:
Bailey April H.,LaFrance Marianne
Abstract
When asked to pick a typical human, people are more likely to pick a man than a woman, a phenomenon reflecting androcentrism. Social media websites provide a relevant context in which to study androcentrism since many websites aim to provide users with an ostensibly gender-neutral icon if users do not upload one of their own images. In our first study, 50 male and female online participants (Mage = 35.70) rated whether actual avatar icons from highly trafficked social media websites are perceived as gender-neutral. Using bi-polar scales from woman to man participants reported that overall the icons appeared to be more male-typed than gender-neutral. In Study 2, we investigated whether adding more female-typed icons would discourage or promote androcentric thinking. An online sample of 608 male and female participants (Mage = 33.76) viewed either 12 avatar icons that reflected the over-representation of male-typed icons or 12 that included an equal number of male and female-typed icons. Participants were then asked to produce an example of a typical person. Finally, we measured political ideology on two liberal-conservative scales. We found evidence that exposure to an equal number of male-typed and female-typed avatar icons generated reactance among political conservatives, and thus may have constituted an ideological threat. Conservatives who saw an equal number of male-typed and female-typed icons were twice as likely to come up with a man as a typical person compared to conservatives who saw an over-representation of male-typed avatar icons. Consistent with system-justification theory, these findings show how male-centric thinking is also evident in a seemingly gender-neutral online context.
Subject
General Psychology,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Communication,Information Systems,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference52 articles.
1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.
2. American Psychological Association. (1978). Guidelines for nonsexist language in APA journals: Publication manual change sheet 2. Educational Researcher, 7(3), 15-17.
3. Bailey, A. H., & LaFrance, M. (2016). Who counts as human? Antecedents to androcentric behavior. Sex Roles. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0648-4
4. Beery, T. A. (1995). Gender bias in the diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care, 24, 427-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-9563(95)80020-4
5. Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献