Abstract
This article takes the E.L. Smith Solar Farm at the E.L. Smith Water treatment plant in Alberta – a province at the epicentre of Canada’s oil and gas industry – as a case study for what I call deep energy literacy. An energy transition away from fossil fuels to sustainable energy sources is a necessary first response to climate change. Deep energy literacy is a proposition, a set of theoretical concepts, through which to disrupt, or “hack”, technophilic transitions by attending to intersectional feminist and decolonial politics and solidarities. Technocratic solutions for decarbonization that do not radically reorient existing social, economic, and political relationships are failed solutions even before implementation begins because they have not addressed the root cause of climate change: a bankrupt extractivist worldview. This worldview is the cause of not only climate change but multiple converging crises. Deep energy literacy is a proposition grounded in relationality that can help us identify problems more holistically and thereby come up with solutions that not only address necessary energy transition shifts, but that do so while simultaneously addressing a plethora of other concerns – including but not limited to Indigenous (re)conciliation – by creating more equitable and just societies and ecosystems. Seen through the lens of deep energy literacy, this analysis of the processes through which the E.L. Smith Solar Farm project was approved illustrates that when decisions about new energy infrastructure are based in entrenched economic, political, social, and epistemological paradigms, they fail to disrupt the status quo and therefore fail to adequately address the root causes of climate change. To achieve a just transition many experiments need to take place; many of these experimentations will be imperfect. In the case study considered in this paper, I suggest that while deep energy literacy conversations were begun, they were not integrated fulsomely enough. Nonetheless, there are positive lessons to be taken from the E.L. Smith Solar Farm and integrated into future decision-making processes.
Reference100 articles.
1. Backhouse, Constance and David H. Flaherty. 1992. Challenging Times: The Women's Movement in Canada and the United States. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.
2. Bell-Pasht, Kyra. 2020. "5 Reasons Every City Needs a Carbon Budget." Sustainability Solutions Group. Retrieved September 29, 2020 (http://www.ssg.coop/5-reasons-every-city-needs-a-carbon-budget/).
3. Blaetz, Robin, ed. 2007. Women's Experimental Cinema: Critical Frameworks. Durham: Duke University Press.
4. Berlant, Lauren. 2016. "The Commons: Infrastructures for Troubling Times." Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34(3): 393-419. doi: 10.1177/0263775816645989
5. Betasamosake Simpson, Leanne. 2011. Dancing on Our Turtle's Back: Stories of Nishnaabeg Re-Creation, Resurgence, and a New Emergence. Winnipeg: Arbeiter Ring Publishing.