Author:
Riives Armas,Murumaa-Mengel Maria,Ivask Signe
Abstract
Several studies have established that female journalists experience (sexual) harassment and online abuse considerably more than their male colleagues. Understandably, this has resulted in a gap in research – male journalists’ experiences with abusive online communication have not yet been thoroughly studied. This paper seeks to understand how abusive communication is contextualised and defined by male journalists in the context of hegemonic masculinity, and to explore which coping strategies are employed to overcome such experiences. From qualitative in-depth interviews with male journalists (n=15), we found that participants considered different forms of abusive online communication from readers/sources a normalised practice, “feedback” that one must just ignore or overcome. Experiences are interpreted predominantly in the frame of hegemonic (complicit) masculinity, but the results also indicate that shifts in these rigid norms are emerging and can be embraced when acknowledged and supported by surrounding structures.
Reference61 articles.
1. "Structural Functions of the Targeted Joke: Iranian Modernity and the Qazvini Man as Predatory Homosexual;Abedinifard;" International Journal of Humor Research,2016
2. "'They Go for Gender First': The Nature and Effect of Sexist Abuse of Female Technology Journalists;Adams;" Journalism Practice,2018
3. "Inside out: Narrative Autoethnography as a Path toward Rapport;Berger;" Qualitative Inquiry,2001
4. Berger, Peter L. and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City: Anchor Books.
5. "Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology;Braun;" Qualitative Research in Psychology,2006
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献