Specificity of the seasonal dynamics of picoplankton communities in lotic aquatic ecosystems-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Specificity of the seasonal dynamics of picoplankton communities in lotic aquatic ecosystems

Published:2024-08 Issue:1(11) Volume: Page:75-89
ISSN:2587-9367
Container-title:Hydrosphere Еcology (Экология гидросферы)
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Mosharova Irina V.¹^ORCID,Akylova Anastasia Y.²^ORCID,Hazanova Ksenia P.²^ORCID,Mosharov Sergey A.¹^ORCID,Goldobina Leonela I.²,Ilinskiy Vladimir V.²^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

2. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

Studies were carried out of the seasonal dynamics of quantitative parameters of picoplankton: the total number of bacteria, the number of bacteria with an active electron transport chain and their share in bacterioplankton, the number of autotrophic picoplankton, the content of chlorophyll a and its picofraction, as well as temperature and hydrochemical regimes in the waters of three stations with different levels biogenic pollution on the Moscow River. The highest values of all studied parameters were observed for waters at st. NKS is the zone of direct influence of the Kuryanovsky treatment facilities. A bimodal type of seasonal dynamics of picoplankton was observed: for autotrophic picoplankton, maximum abundance was observed at the end of April and June, for bacterioplankton – in July and October.

Publisher

Farwater LLC

Reference18 articles.

1. Callieri C. Picophytoplankton in freshwater ecosystems: the importance of small-sized phototrophs. Freshwater Rev. 2008. V.1. No 1. P. 1–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1608/FRJ-1.1.1

2. Callieri C., Stockner J.G. Freshwater autotrophic picoplankton: a review. J. of Limnology. 2002. V.61. No 1. P. 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2002.1

3. Caron D.A. Technique for enumeration of heterotrophic and phototrophic nanoplankton, using epifluorescence microscopy, and comparison with other procedures. Appl. and Environ. Microbiol. 1983. V.46(2). P. 491–498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.46.2.491-498.1983

4. Contant J., Pick F.R. Picophytoplankton during the ice-free season in five temperate-zone rivers. Journal of Plankton Research. 2013. V.35. No 3. P. 553–565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbt013

5. Del Giorgio P.A., Scarborough G. Increase in the proportion of metabolically active bacteria along gradients of enrichment in freshwater and marine plankton: implication for estimates of bacterial growth and production rates. J. Plankton Research. 1995. V.17. No 10. P. 1905–1924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/17.10.1905