Smart Specializations from the Standpoint of Leading Schools of Economic Theory

Author:

Vyshnevskyi O. S.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Industrial Economics of the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv

Abstract

Focus on smart specialization is a key element of regional development strategizing in Ukraine, which, for example, is reflected in the State Regional Development Strategy for 2021-2027. But a comparative analysis of individual indicators of the economic development of the EU, the USA and China shows that smart specialization itself is not a competitive advantage on a global scale. At the same time, the researchers note that there is a gap between the theory and the practice of strategizing on the basis of smart specialization. Although theoretical issues related to smart specialization are not overlooked by researchers, the direct understanding of smart specialization processes from the standpoint of specific schools of economic theory is extremely limited. Therefore, the goal of the study is to reduce the essence of the concept of smart specialization from the standpoint of leading schools of economic theory. For the analysis, a classification was chosen, according to which 9 schools of economic theory are distinguished: (1) Classical, (2) Neoclassical, (3) Marxist, (4) Developmentalist, (5) Austrian, (6) Schumpeterian, (7) Keynesian, (8) Institutionalist, (9) Behaviouralist. Of the nine considered leading schools of economic theory, almost half of the schools (Classical, Developmentalist, Schumpeterian, and Institutionalist) significantly influenced the formation of the essence of smart specialization. Smart specialization has been moderately influenced by Neoclassical, Marxist and Keynesian schools. Austrian and Behaviouralist schools are characterized by a slight influence on smart specialization. Thus, smart specialization to a significant or moderate degree corresponds to individual provisions of 7 out of the 9 leading schools of economic theory considered in this study. Smart specialization synthesizes the positions of different schools of economic theory. Two alternatives follow from this: either the concept of smart specialization is a “constructive” tool for combining the “best” practices of various schools of economic theory, or it is an eclectic combination of ideas that are fundamentally incompatible. An unambiguous solution to this dilemma is possible on a practical level in the long term. Keywords smart specialization, schools of economic theory, definition, reduction.

Publisher

Academy of Economic Sciences of Ukraine

Subject

General Medicine

Reference21 articles.

1. Pro zatverdzhennia Derzhavnoi stratehii rehional­noho rozvytku na 2021-2027 roky: Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 5 serpnia 2020 r. № 695 [On the approval of the State Regional Development Strategy for 2021-2027: Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated August 5, 2020. No. 695]. (2020). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/695-2020-%D0%BF#Text [in Ukrainian].

2. Storonianska, I. Z. et al. (2021). Terytorialnyi rozvytok i rehionalna polityka. Stymuliuvannia rozvytku rehioniv na zasadakh smart-spetsializatsii: bariery ta mekhanizmy implementatsii [Territorial development and regional policy. Stimulating the development of regions on the basis of smart specialization: barriers and mechanisms of implementation]. Lviv, IRD NANU. 155 p. Retrieved from https://ird.gov.ua/irdp/p20210034.pdf [in Ukra­inian].

3. Yehorov, I. et al. (2019). Vyznachennia osnovnykh napriamiv smart-spetsializatsii mista Kyieva: zvit pro rezultaty nadannia doslidnytskykh posluh za dohovorom №SSK/2019. Kyiv, Instytut ekonomiky ta prohnozuvannia NAN Ukrainy. Retrieved from https://dei.kyivcity.gov.ua/files/2019/10/22/Zvit_dosl.pdf [in Ukrainian].

4. Chykarenko, I. A., Mamatova, T. V., Chykarenko, O.O. (2020). Stratehiia rehionalnoho rozvytku na osnovi cmart-spetsializatsii: metodolohichni zasady [Regional development strategy based on cmart specialization: methodological principles]. Aspekty publichnoho upravlinnia – Aspects of public administration, Vol. 8. No. 1, pp. 30-42. [in Ukrainian].

5. Shevchenko, A. V. (2019). Stratehichni priorytety vprovadzhennia smart-spetsializatsii u promyslovosti Ukrainy [Strategic priorities for the implementation of smart specialization in the industry of Ukraine]. Biznes Inform – Business Inform, No. 10, pp. 130–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2019-10-130-135 [in Ukrainian].

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3