Abstract
The question of whether evidence that was obtained unlawfully can be admitted as evidence is discussed in any criminal justice system. This paper examines the solutions that can be found in EU secondary and primary law and in the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union. It reveals that different area of EU law use different approaches, which can be explained by the underlying rationales.
Publisher
European Integration Studies
Reference13 articles.
1. Böse, M. (2021) ‘Judicial Protection in International and EU Law’, in Böse, M., Bröcker, M., Schneider, A. (eds.) Judicial Protection in Transnational Criminal Proceedings. Cham: Springer, pp. 395-436; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55796-6_11
2. Böse, M. (2014a) ‘Die Europäische Ermittlungsanordnung – Beweistransfer nach neuen Regeln?’ Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik, 9(4), pp. 152-164.
3. Böse, M. (2014b) ‘Fundamental Rights of the EU Charter’, in Böse, M., Meyer, F. Schneider, A. (eds.) Conflicts of Jurisdiction in Criminal Matters in the European Union, Volume 2: Rights, Principles and Model Rules. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 107-168; https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845255538_107
4. Burchard, C. (2021) ‘Art. 37 – Evidence’, in Herrnfeld, H., Brodowski, D., Burchard, C. (eds.) European Public Prosecutor’s Office. 1st ed. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 345-352; https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845290768-345
5. Caianiello, M., Lasagni, G. (2022) ‘Comparative remarks’, in Contissa, G., Lasagni, G., Caianiello, M., Sartor, G. (eds.) Effective Protection of the Rights of the Accused in the EU Directives. Leiden: Brill, pp. 229-258; https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004513396_015