Affiliation:
1. Buckinghamshire New University
2. National Foundation for Educational Research
Abstract
Choosing the right candidate for the job is a continuing concern within the public and private sectors. The personnel selection systems are one of the most important factors affecting the efficiency of organizations that has to be considered carefully, which aims to find the best candidate by matching qualifications and requirements of the job. Thus, psychometric assessments are used to employ the most skilled person among applicants. One of the most significant challenges of assessing candidates is the validity of the psychometric test used to assess candidate performances. Lack of evidence on scales and candidate population may mislead recruiters to hire unqualified individuals for the position. A considerable amount of literature has been published on using psychological scales for recruitment. However, much less is known about candidate’s latent profiles. This study highlights the importance of validation of scale in recruitment and seeks to reveal the latent profiles of candidates. The latent profile analysis identified two profiles for Vocational Adjustment, Social Skills, and Self-Control. The study results indicate that advanced and low Vocational Adjustment profiles show no extreme difference in both respects except for the Time management scores. However, higher profiles outperformed on Stress, Emotional Sensitivity, and Emotional Adaptation for the Social Skills domain. Like previous findings, self-consciousness scores are the highest of all subtests among low component profiles for the Self-Control domain
Publisher
Trakya Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Building and Construction
Reference31 articles.
1. Abtahamson, R. L., & Pickle, H. B. (1996). Introduction to Business. Gookyesr Publising Company.
2. AERA, APA, & NCME. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
3. Akogul, S., & Erisoglu, M. (2017). An approach for determining the number of clusters in a model-based cluster analysis. Entropy, 19(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/e19090452
4. Byars, L. L., & Rue, L. W. (2000). Human Resource Management. Irwin/McGraw-Hill. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=g9tUnxxU0tUC
5. Carless, S. A. (2009). Psychological testing for selection purposes: A guide to evidence-based practice for human resource professionals. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(12), 2517–2532. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190903363821