Tax the rich? Taxation as a way to discourage regulations

Author:

Méndez Reátegui RubénORCID,Sumar Albujar Oscar

Abstract

Economic regulation is a way for interest groups to gain rent by reducing competition. However, regulations are often understood as anti-signatures. This is due to a lack of economic knowledge combined with an inability to process information about the real costs of average regulations on the part of the citizen. As a result, we often find ourselves in a dynamic where the real motivation behind regulations is rarely recognized and, in this way, interest groups benefit by not paying their costs. Traditional methods of dealing with regulatory quality are not working. Therefore, this article proposes a way to address this problem: to put the cost of regulation where the benefits are, i.e., on the industry or other stakeholders that are the main beneficiaries of the regulation, and to analyze the elements of the proposed regulation from an ius-economic approach and study case studies related to the situation of Peruvian universities. This is done through a descriptive, legal-theoretical, and economic methodology based on a review of contemporary literature. Finally, consider the creation of a tax for the interest groups that benefit from the regulations. While this idea is not new, it has not yet been implemented or described operationally. This commentary is an effort to bring this idea into academic and public debate.

Publisher

Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades desde America Latina

Subject

General Medicine

Reference38 articles.

1. Akinbogun, S. & Jones, C. (2018). Externalities and Planning Failure in the Housing Market. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 11(2), 433-447. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-06-2017-0056

2. Arellano, O., Moscoso, Y. & Quispe, G. (2019). Valoración del costo – beneficio en la recuperación de residuos de materia prima en empresas industriales. Economía, empresas e inclusión (CTEC), 3(1), 669-685.

3. Ayres, I. (November 18, 2009). Freakonomics. http://freakonomics.com/author/ianayres/

4. Baldwing, R., Cave, M. & Lodge, M. (2012). Understanding Regulation. Theory, Strategy, and Practice. Oxford University Press.

5. Bour, E. (2018). La teoría de “Public Choice”. Ebour.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3