Measuring Stroke Survivors’ Functional Status Independence: Five Perspectives

Author:

Shih Min-Mei1,Rogers Joan C.2,Skidmore Elizabeth R.3,Irrgang James J.4,Holm Margo B.5

Affiliation:

1. Min-Mei Shih, PhD, OTR, is Postdoctoral Associate, Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, 5019 Forbes Tower, Pittsburgh, PA 15260; mis32@pitt.edu

2. Joan C. Rogers, PhD, OTR/L, FAOTA, is Professor of Occupational Therapy, Psychiatry, and Nursing, and Chairperson, Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

3. Elizabeth R. Skidmore, PhD, OTR/L, is Assistant Professor, Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

4. James J. Irrgang, PT, PhD, CAT, is Associate Professor and Director of Clinical Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

5. Margo B. Holm, PhD, OTR/L, FAOTA, is Professor and Director, Post-Professional Education, Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

Abstract

Abstract An understandable measure to describe disabilities after stroke is important for clinical practice; practitioners often use multiple measures that contain different scoring systems and scales to rate activities of daily living (ADL) independence. We compared the construct of independence in five measures used with stroke survivors. The measures evaluated independence of the stroke survivors somewhat differently. The Rasch analysis Partial Credit Model converted items from these measures to a single metric, yielding an item difficulty hierarchy of all items from the measures. Data from the measures should be interpreted carefully because other concepts or constructs in addition to ADL independence are included in some of the measures. Rasch diagnostics regarding construct validity and reliability of the combined measures also indicated that these measures are not interchangeable. Although the items of the combined ADL measures were unidimensional, they measured independence from multiple perspectives, and the scale of the combined measures was not linear.

Publisher

AOTA Press

Subject

Occupational Therapy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3