Thoroughness and Psychometrics of Fidelity Measures in Occupational and Physical Therapy: A Systematic Review

Author:

Hand Brittany N.1,Darragh Amy R.2,Persch Andrew C.3

Affiliation:

1. Brittany N. Hand, PhD, OTR/L, is Assistant Professor, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus. At the time of the study, she was Student, Division of Occupational Therapy, The Ohio State University, Columbus; hand.58@osu.edu

2. Amy R. Darragh, PhD, OTR/L, is Division Director and Associate Professor, Division of Occupational Therapy, The Ohio State University, Columbus

3. Andrew C. Persch, PhD, OTR/L, is Assistant Professor, Department of Occupational Therapy, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. At the time of the study, he was Assistant Professor, Division of Occupational Therapy, The Ohio State University, Columbus

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVE. This study evaluated the thoroughness and psychometric properties of fidelity measures used by or of relevance to occupational or physical therapy. METHOD. A systematic review of the literature was completed. Assessments used to measure occupational or physical therapy intervention fidelity were evaluated for thoroughness, reliability, validity, and clinical utility. RESULTS. Eight fidelity measures met inclusion criteria for this systematic review. Most of the measures had moderate levels of thoroughness in the coverage of key aspects of fidelity, reported adequate to excellent reliability and validity, and were highly variable in clinical utility. CONCLUSION. Additional research is recommended to validate existing occupational or physical therapy fidelity measures and to develop novel measures for other occupational therapy and physical therapy interventions. Clinicians and researchers must place greater emphasis on the development and implementation of fidelity measures to ensure uniformity in intervention delivery and high-quality, evidence-based care.

Publisher

AOTA Press

Subject

Occupational Therapy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3