Predicting Older Driver On-Road Performance by Means of the Useful Field of View and Trail Making Test Part B

Author:

Classen Sherrilene1,Wang Yanning2,Crizzle Alexander M.3,Winter Sandra M.4,Lanford Desiree N.5

Affiliation:

1. Sherrilene Classen, PhD, MPH, OTR/L, is Professor and Director, School of Occupational Therapy, Elborn College, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5B9; sclassen@uwo.ca. At the time of the study, she was Director, Institute for Mobility, Activity and Participation, and Associate Professor, Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University

2. Yanning Wang, MS, is Doctoral Student, Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville

3. Alexander M. Crizzle, PhD, MPH, is Postdoctoral Associate, Institute for Mobility, Activity and Participation, and Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville

4. Sandra M. Winter, PhD, OTR/L, is Research Coordinator, Institute for Mobility, Activity and Participation, and Postdoctoral Associate, Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville

5. Desiree N. Lanford, MOT, OTR/L, CDRS, is Certified Driving Rehabilitation Specialist, Institute for Mobility, Activity and Participation and Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville

Abstract

Abstract The Useful Field of View® (UFOV) and Trail Making Test Part B (Trails B) are measures of divided attention. We determined which measure was more accurate in predicting on-road outcomes among drivers (N = 198, mean age = 73.86, standard deviation = 6.05). Receiver operating characteristic curves for the UFOV (Risk Index [RI] and Subtests 1–3) and Trails B significantly predicted on-road outcomes. Contrasting Trails B with the UFOV RI and subtests, the only difference was found between the UFOV RI and Trails B, indicating the UFOV RI was the best predictor of on-road outcomes. Misclassifications of drivers totaled 28 for the UFOV RI, 62 for Trails B, and 58 for UFOV Subtest 2. The UFOV RI is a superior test in predicting on-road outcomes, but the Trails B has acceptable accuracy and is comparable to the other UFOV subtests.

Publisher

AOTA Press

Subject

Occupational Therapy

Cited by 45 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3