Adult Norms for a Commercially Available Nine Hole Peg Test for Finger Dexterity

Author:

Oxford Grice Kimatha1,Vogel Kimberly A.2,Le Viet3,Mitchell Ana4,Muniz Sonia5,Vollmer Mary Ann6

Affiliation:

1. Kimatha Oxford Grice, MOT, OTR, CHT, is Associate Professor, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Department of Occupational Therapy, Mail Code 6245, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, Texas 78229-3900; oxford@uthscsa.edu

2. Kimberly A. Vogel, EdD, OTR, is Associate Professor, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Department of Occupational Therapy, San Antonio, Texas

3. Viet Le, OTR, is Former Graduate Student, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Department of Occupational Therapy, San Antonio, Texas

4. Ana Mitchell, OTR, is Former Graduate Student, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Department of Occupational Therapy, San Antonio, Texas

5. Sonia Muniz, OTR, is Former Graduate Student, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Department of Occupational Therapy, San Antonio, Texas

6. Mary Ann Vollmer, OTR, is Former Graduate Student, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Department of Occupational Therapy, San Antonio, Texas

Abstract

Abstract The Nine Hole Peg Test is commonly used by occupational therapists as a simple, quick assessment for finger dexterity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interrater and test–retest reliability of the commercially available Smith & Nephew Rehabilitation Division version of the Nine Hole Peg Test, and to establish new adult norms for the Nine Hole Peg Test for finger dexterity utilizing this particular version. Two of the researchers established interrater and test–retest reliability by evaluating 25 occupational therapy student volunteers. Seven hundred and three subjects, ranging in age from 21 to 71+ years, were tested to establish norms, using the standard protocol. Results showed high interrater reliability and only moderate test–retest reliability. Scores obtained by using the commercially available version were not statistically different from previously published norms (Mathiowetz, Weber, Kashman, & Volland, 1985). This study supports the original norms and further assists occupational therapists to evaluate dexterity accurately.

Publisher

AOTA Press

Subject

Occupational Therapy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3