Off-Road Driving Evaluations for Persons With Cerebral Injury: A Factor Analytic Study of Predriver and Simulator Testing

Author:

Galski Thomas1,Ehle Holly T.2,Williams J. Bradley3

Affiliation:

1. Thomas Galski, PhD, is Director of Psychology and Neuro-psychology, Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, 240 Central Avenue, East Orange, New Jersey 07018, and Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey

2. Holly T. Ehle, OTR, is Director of Occupational Therapy, Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, East Orange, New Jersey

3. J. Bradley Williams, PhD, is Rehabilitation Psychologist, Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, East Orange, New Jersey

Abstract

Abstract Objectives. Off-road evaluations composed of psychometric testing and simulator driving are commonly used in rehabilitation settings to assess a person's fitness to resume driving after a cerebral injury. Although the results of these evaluation methods separately provide information about ability to drive, there is no clear understanding about what is measured in comprehensive off-road evaluations as a whole. This study explored the interrelationship of perceptual, cognitive, behavioral, and operational variables that form the basic for off-road evaluations in order to determine whether there are basic dimensions underlying performance in these evaluations and to derive a small set of variables that could help in refining methods for evaluating persons with cerebral injuries. Methods. One-hundred six persons with cerebral damage due to brain injury or cerebrovascular accident were administered a predriver evaluation that consisted of selected neuropsychometric tests. Subjects were also evaluated in a driving simulator that measured their operational responses to filmed driving situations and assessed their behaviors. Principal component analysis was used to identify manifest and latent variables contributing to the results of the evaluations. Results. The analysis produced a model with five independent (orthogonal) eigenvectors, or factors, for this population: Higher Order Visuospatial Abilities, Basic Visual Recognition and Responding, Anticipatory Braking, Defensive Steering, and Behavioral Manifestations of Complex Attention. These factors accounted for 66.14% of the total variance in the subjects’ responses to comprehensive off-road evaluations. Conclusion. These factors were useful in understanding driving performance and the role of predriver and simulator testing in driver evaluations.

Publisher

AOTA Press

Subject

Occupational Therapy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3