Agreement Between Occupational Therapy Practice Framework Classifications and Occupational Therapists’ Classifications

Author:

Butts Denea S.1,Nelson David L.2

Affiliation:

1. Denea S. Butts is Occupational Therapist, Harborside Healthcare, 395 Harding Avenue, Defiance, OH 43512. While conducting the study, she was a Student, Occupational Therapy Doctorate Degree Program, College of Health Science and Human Service, The University of Toledo Health Science Campus, OH; denea.butts@utoledo.edu

2. David L. Nelson, PhD, OTR/L, FAOTA, is Professor, Department of Occupational Therapy, Collier Building, College of Health Science and Human Service, The University of Toledo Health Science Campus, OH

Abstract

Abstract The American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA) developed the Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain and Process (the Framework) to categorize and organize concepts in the field of occupational therapy in a manner that would be understandable to practitioners within the field as well as to external readers. The current study investigates the degree to which occupational therapists’ classification of terminology agrees with the Framework’s classification of terminology. Through mail survey format, 200 randomly selected AOTA occupational therapist members were asked to classify 30 randomly selected terms from the Framework into the 6 domain categories of the Framework. Based on the responses of 94 completed surveys, low levels of agreement were found between therapists’ and the Framework’s categorizations. Overall, practicing therapists did not categorize terms in a manner consistent with the categorization of the Framework. We recommend that AOTA refrain from developing systems of categorization, at least until a consensus develops in the field concerning terminology.

Publisher

AOTA Press

Subject

Occupational Therapy

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The unsustainability of occupational based model diagrams;Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy;2019-01-11

2. O REGISTRO DA INTERVENÇÃO NO PRONTUÁRIO PELO TERAPEUTA OCUPACIONAL EM UM AMBULATÓRIO INFANTO-JUVENIL;Cadernos de Terapia Ocupacional da UFSCar;2015

3. Occupational Therapy: Emphasis on Clinical Practice;International Handbook of Occupational Therapy Interventions;2014-11-26

4. Describing What We Do: A Qualitative Study of Clinicians' Perspectives on Classifying Rehabilitation Interventions;Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation;2014-01

5. Occupational Therapists, Care and Managerialism;Clinical Reasoning in Occupational Therapy;2013-03-28

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3