Pediatric Occupational Therapists’ Perspectives on Sleep: A Qualitative Descriptive Study

Author:

Hartman Amy G.1,Caspero Kaitlyn2,Bodison Stefanie C.3,Soehner Adriane4,Akcakaya Murat5,DeAlmeida Dilhari6,Bendixen Roxanna7

Affiliation:

1. Amy G. Hartman, PhD, OTR/L, is Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; agh38@pitt.edu

2. Kaitlyn Caspero, MS, OTR/L, is Occupational Therapist and Founder, OT Graphically, Frederick, MD.

3. Stefanie C. Bodison, OTD, OTR/L, FAOTA, is Assistant Professor, Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville.

4. Adriane Soehner, PhD, is Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

5. Murat Akcakaya, PhD, is Associate Professor, Department of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

6. Dilhari DeAlmeida, PhD, is Associate Professor and Program Director, Department of Health Information Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

7. Roxanna Bendixen, PhD, OTR/L, FAOTA, is Associate Professor and Division Director, Department of Occupational Therapy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.

Abstract

Abstract Importance: Insufficient sleep is common among children seeking occupational therapy services but is rarely a focus of therapy despite sleep’s critical impact on health. Objective: To examine pediatric occupational therapists’ experiences, views, and confidence in addressing sleep concerns in their practice as well as barriers to and supports for doing so. Design: A qualitative descriptive study with thematic analysis of data from 1-hr virtual interviews. Rapport building, multiple-coder analysis, and member checking were used to ensure reliability and validity. Setting: Interviews were conducted remotely at each participant’s preferred time and location. Participants: Pediatric occupational therapists (N = 20) practicing across multiple settings in the United States were recruited through emails directed to their place of work and social media posts. A goal of 20 participants was set a priori with the goal of thematic saturation. Outcomes and Measures: A semistructured interview guide. Results: Participants were predominately cisgender (95%), female (85%), and White, non-Hispanic (90%). Overall, they voiced the importance of sleep but reported almost never writing sleep-related goals. Reported barriers that affected the participants’ ability to fully address sleep in practice included therapists’ lack of confidence and knowledge and low caregiver buy-in. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings identify themes on the basis of which actionable steps toward promoting occupational therapists as sleep champions can be developed. Future implications include increasing sleep education opportunities, enhancing awareness of sleep health’s impact on goal areas, and facilitating discussions about occupational therapy’s role within the medical system and family system in supporting sleep. Plain-Language Summary: This qualitative study identifies what helps and hinders occupational therapists in addressing the sleep health concerns of their clients. We give occupational therapy clinicians and educators key supports to seek out or barriers to address.

Publisher

AOTA Press

Reference28 articles.

1. ABCs of SLEEPING: A review of the evidence behind pediatric sleep practice recommendations;Allen;Sleep Medicine Reviews,2016

2. Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (4th ed.);American Occupational Therapy Association;American Journal of Occupational Therapy,2020

3. Matrix analysis as a complementary analytic strategy in qualitative inquiry;Averill;Qualitative Health Research,2002

4. Occupation- and activity-based interventions to improve performance of instrumental activities of daily living and rest and sleep for children and youth Ages 5–21: A systematic review;Beisbier;American Journal of Occupational Therapy,2020

5. Management of sleep disorders in children with neurodevelopmental disorders: A review;Blackmer;Pharmacotherapy,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3