Validity and Reliability of the Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ11) in a U.S. Sample of Adults With Type 1 Diabetes

Author:

Hernandez Raymond1,Schneider Stefan2,Wagman Petra3,Håkansson Carita4,Spruijt-Metz Donna5,Pyatak Elizabeth A.6

Affiliation:

1. Raymond Hernandez, PhD, OTR/L, is Postdoctoral Scholar, Dornsife Center for Economic & Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles; hray57024@gmail.com

2. Stefan Schneider, PhD, is Senior Research Scientist, Dornsife Center for Economic & Social Research, and Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

3. Petra Wagman, PhD, Reg OT, is Associate Professor, Department of Rehabilitation, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.

4. Carita Håkansson, PhD, Reg OT, is Senior Lecturer, Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

5. Donna Spruijt-Metz, PhD, MFA, was Director of the USC mHealth Collaboratory, Dornsife Center for Economic & Social Research; Director of Responsible Conduct in Research, Keck School of Medicine; and Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, at the time of this research.

6. Elizabeth A. Pyatak, PhD, OTR/L, CDCES, DipACLM, FAOTA, is Associate Professor, Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

Abstract

Abstract Importance: Although occupational balance (OB) is a construct of importance to occupational therapy, existing OB assessments have not been validated in clinical populations. Objective: To examine the validity and reliability of the 11-item version of the Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ11) in U.S. adults with Type 1 diabetes. Design: Data were analyzed from adults with Type 1 diabetes enrolled in a larger longitudinal study examining the relationships among blood glucose, emotion, and functioning. Dimensionality of the OBQ11 was assessed with item response theory (IRT); convergent validity was tested by examining whether associations between the OBQ11 and other constructs were consistent with a priori hypotheses. Setting: Three outpatient clinical sites in the United States. Participants: Data from 208 U.S. adults with Type 1 diabetes were included in the analyses (42% Latino, 29% White, 14% African American, 7% multiethnic, and 8% other). Outcomes and Measures: Assessments administered include the OBQ11, Patient Health Questionnaire (depression), and Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire. Results: Overall, results from IRT models and correlational tests supported the reliability and validity of the OBQ11. For instance, higher scores on the OBQ11 were significantly associated with better self-ratings of diabetes management behaviors (r = .28, p < .001), lower depression symptoms (r = −.53, p < .001), and greater positive affect (r = .32, p < .001). A single-factor generalized partial credit model fit the OBQ11 acceptably well, supporting its unidimensionality. Conclusions and Relevance: The OBQ11 may be a reliable and valid measure of OB appropriate for use in clinical populations such as adults with diabetes. What This Article Adds: OB is not often formally assessed by occupational therapists in the United States, even though the contributions of OB to health and well-being are core components of the philosophy of occupational therapy. The current evidence supports the validity of the OBQ11 in a clinical population of adults with Type 1 diabetes and demonstrates significant associations between OB and health management behaviors. Study results may encourage greater consideration and assessment of OB in occupational therapy clinical practice in the United States.

Publisher

AOTA Press

Subject

Occupational Therapy

Reference66 articles.

1. Appraising convergent validity of patient-reported outcome measures in systematic reviews: Constructing hypotheses and interpreting outcomes;Abma;BMC Research Notes,2016

2. Occupational performance coaching for chronic conditions: A review of literature;Alcorn;New Zealand Journal of Occupational Therapy,2014

3. Diabetes self- management amid COVID-19 pandemic;Banerjee;Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome,2020

4. Meaning of occupation-based groups for low-income urban youths attending after-school care;Bazyk;American Journal of Occupational Therapy,2009

5. mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment;Chalmers;Journal of Statistical Software,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3