Reporting Quality in Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High-Impact Occupational Therapy Journals-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Reporting Quality in Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High-Impact Occupational Therapy Journals

Published:2022-06-30 Issue:4 Volume:76 Page:
ISSN:0272-9490
Container-title:The American Journal of Occupational Therapy
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Fernández-Pires Paula¹,Prieto-Botella Daniel²,Valera-Gran Desirée³,Hurtado-Pomares Miriam⁴,Espinosa-Sempere Cristina⁵,Sánchez-Pérez Alicia⁶,Juárez-Leal Iris⁷,Peral-Gómez Paula⁸,Moreno-Campos Leticia⁹,Navarrete-Muñoz Eva-María¹⁰

Affiliation:

1. Paula Fernández-Pires, MPH, is Occupational Therapist, Predoctoral Fellow, and Graduate Teaching Assistant, Department of Surgery and Pathology, Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain.

2. Daniel Prieto-Botella, MPH, is Occupational Therapist, Predoctoral Fellow, and Research Assistant, Department of Surgery and Pathology, Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain.

3. Desirée Valera-Gran, MPH, PhD, is Assistant Professor, Occupational Therapy Research Group (InTeO), Department of Surgery and Pathology, Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain; dvalera@umh.es

4. Miriam Hurtado-Pomares, PhD, is Occupational Therapist and Associate Professor, Occupational Therapy Research Group (InTeO), Department of Surgery and Pathology, Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain.

5. Cristina Espinosa-Sempere, PhD, is Occupational Therapist, Predoctoral Fellow, and Graduate Teaching Assistant, Occupational Therapy Research Group (InTeO), Department of Surgery and Pathology, Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain.

6. Alicia Sánchez-Pérez, PhD, is Occupational Therapist and Associate Professor, Occupational Therapy Research Group (InTeO), Department of Surgery and Pathology, Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain.

7. Iris Juárez-Leal, OT, is Occupational Therapist, Predoctoral Fellow, and Graduate Teaching Assistant, Occupational Therapy Research Group (InTeO), Department of Surgery and Pathology, Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain.

8. Paula Peral-Gómez, PhD, is Occupational Therapist and Assistant Professor, Occupational Therapy Research Group (InTeO), Department of Surgery and Pathology, Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain.

9. Leticia Moreno-Campos, OT, is Occupational Therapist, Department of Surgery and Pathology, Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain.

10. Eva-María Navarrete-Muñoz, MPH, PhD, is Assistant Professor, Occupational Therapy Research Group (InTeO), Department of Surgery and Pathology, Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain.

Abstract

Abstract Importance: Adequate reporting in the abstracts of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is essential to enable occupational therapy practitioners to critically appraise the validity of findings. Objective: To evaluate the reporting quality and characteristics of RCT abstracts published between 2008 and 2018 in the occupational therapy journals with the five highest impact factors in 2018. Design: A descriptive cross-sectional study. Data Sources: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT), Australian Occupational Therapy Journal (AOTJ), Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy (CJOT), Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy (SJOT), and Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics (POTP) were identified using a Web of Science search. Study Selection and Data Collection: We searched Scopus for abstracts in the five included journals. We used a 17-point scale based on the CONSORT for Abstracts (CONSORT-A) checklist to assess reporting quality. We also identified characteristics of the abstracts. Findings: Seventy-eight RCT abstracts were assessed and showed moderate to low adherence to the CONSORT-A checklist (Mdn = 8, interquartile range = 7–9). Abstracts of articles with authors from a higher number of institutions, European first authors, and >200 words had higher CONSORT-A scores. The most underreported CONSORT-A items were trial design, blinding, numbers analyzed, outcome (results), harms, trial registration, and funding. Conclusions and Relevance: Between 2008 and 2018, the reporting quality in RCT abstracts from the five highest impact occupational therapy journals was moderate to low. Inadequate reporting in RCT abstracts raises the risk that occupational therapy practitioners will make ineffective clinical decisions based on misinterpretation of findings. What This Article Adds: Reporting quality in RCT abstracts in occupational therapy journals is moderate to low. Journal editors should require authors of RCTs to use the CONSORT-A checklist to promote optimal reporting and transparency in abstracts.

Publisher

AOTA Press

Subject

Occupational Therapy

Link

https://research.aota.org/ajot/article-pdf/doi/10.5014/ajot.2022.042333/75331/7604205120.pdf

Reference34 articles.

1. Critical appraisal of clinical research;Al-Jundi;Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research,2017

2. Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process;American Occupational Therapy Association;American Journal of Occupational Therapy,2014

3. Guidelines for contributors to AJOT;American Occupational Therapy Association;American Journal of Occupational Therapy,2020

4. The impact of open access upon public health;Barbour;Bulletin of the World Health Organization,2006

5. The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals;Berwanger;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,2009