Assignment Artifacts and What They Reveal About How Occupation Is Addressed in U.S. Occupational Therapy Curricula

Author:

Hooper Barb1,Krishnagiri Sheama2,Price Pollie3,Taff Steven D.4,Bilics Andrea5

Affiliation:

1. Barb Hooper, PhD, OTR, FAOTA, is Program Director and Division Chief, Occupational Therapy Doctorate Division, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. At the time of the study, she was Associate Professor and Academic Program Director, Occupational Therapy Department, and Director, Center for Occupational Therapy Education, Colorado State University, Fort Collins; barbara.hooper@duke.edu.

2. Sheama Krishnagiri, PhD, OTR/L, FAOTA, is in Research Adminstration, Greater Los Angeles VA. At the time of the study, she was Occupational Therapist, Private Practice, Reseda, CA.

3. Pollie Price, PhD, OTR/L, FAOTA, is Associate Professor and Associate Chair, Occupational and Recreational Therapies, University of Utah College of Health, Salt Lake City.

4. Steven D. Taff, PhD, OTR/L, FAOTA, is Associate Professor and Director, Division of Professional Education, Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.

5. Andrea Bilics, PhD, OTR/L, FAOTA, is Emeritus Professor, Worcester State University, Millis, MA.

Abstract

Abstract Importance: Artifacts convey essential skills, tools, and concepts to students. Studies of artifacts can therefore illumine priorities for learning. Objective: To describe the skills, tools, and concepts that assignment artifacts required students to learn, especially in relation to occupation. Design: Educators submitted 243 artifacts that illustrated how their programs addressed occupation. Artifacts included syllabi, lectures, assignments, rubrics, study guides, texts, and learning objectives. A sociocultural research paradigm informed a secondary analysis of all assignment artifacts. Assignments were coded for the skills, tools, and underlying concepts students were to use, particularly related to occupation. Setting: U.S. occupational therapist and occupational therapy assistant academic programs. Participants: Twenty-five U.S academic programs selected through stratified random sampling that targeted representation by geographic region and the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Fifteen occupational therapy and 10 occupational therapy assistant programs consented. Results: Assignment artifacts required students to interview, observe, analyze, and teach (skills); artifacts emphasized learning the Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain and Process (tool). Few artifacts required students to relate skills and tools to broader concepts, including occupation. Those that did used prompts that were ancillary to the assignment. Grading rubrics seldom measured students’ ability to connect skills and tools to occupation. Conclusions and Relevance: By emphasizing skills and tools detached from the concepts supporting their relevance to occupation, the artifacts reflected black box learning. Creating artifacts that reflect glass box learning can improve education. In glass box learning, artifacts are transparent and clearly delineate the skills, tools, and conceptual understandings to be gained. What This Study Adds: For researchers, the study highlights the importance of including artifacts in studies of occupational therapy education. For educators, the study gives guidance for creating assignments that clearly delineate skills, tools, and concepts.

Publisher

AOTA Press

Subject

Occupational Therapy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3