Performance of Medication Tasks: Relationship Among Patient-Reported Outcomes, Performance-Based Assessments, and Objective Assessments

Author:

Schwartz Jaclyn K.1,Aylmer Katherine2,Green Samara3,Tayeb Sami4,Wolf Timothy J.5,Unni Elizabeth6,Somerville Emily7

Affiliation:

1. Jaclyn K. Schwartz, PhD, OTR/L, FAOTA, is Assistant Professor, Program in Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; jaclyns@wustl.edu

2. Katherine Aylmer, OTD, OTR/L, is Occupational Therapist, Program in Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.

3. Samara Green, MS, OTR/L, is Occupational Therapist, MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC.

4. Sami Tayeb, MA, is Research Coordinator, Program in Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.

5. Timothy J. Wolf, PhD, OTD, OTR/L, FAOTA, is Professor, Department of Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.

6. Elizabeth Unni, PhD, MBA, is Associate Professor, Department of Social, Behavioral and Administrative Sciences, Touro College of Pharmacy, New York, NY.

7. Emily Somerville, OTD, OTR/L, is Assistant Professor, Program in Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.

Abstract

Abstract Importance: Occupational therapy practitioners use standardized assessments to guide their clinical decision-making, but it is unclear how well performance on standardized assessments translates to performance at home. Objective: To understand the concurrent and predictive validity of patient-reported outcomes and performance-based assessments for monitoring performance at home within the context of medication management and adherence. Design: Exploratory study. Setting: Participants completed standardized assessments in a lab or at home, which were followed by home-based electronic monitoring of medication adherence. Participants: Sixty community-dwelling adults with hypertension or stroke who independently took antihypertensive medications. Outcomes and Measures: Participants completed the Hill-Bone Medication Adherence Scale, the Hill-Bone Medication Adherence Reasons Scale, the Performance Assessment of Self-Care Skills Medication Management subtask, and the Executive Function Performance Test–Enhanced Medication Management subtest. Then, they used an electronic pill cap to monitor medication adherence at home for 1 month. Results: Patient-reported outcomes and performance-based assessments in the context of medication management and adherence demonstrated poor concurrent and predictive validity to medication adherence at home. Conclusions and Relevance: There is a gap between what people think they will do, what they can do on a standardized assessment, and what they actually do at home. Future research is needed to strengthen concurrent and predictive validity to clinically meaningful outcomes. Plain-Language Summary: Occupational therapy practitioners should use caution when using standardized assessments to try to predict client performance at home. They should also continue to use a battery of assessments, clinical reasoning, and client preferences to guide their decision-making for monitoring performance at home within the context of medication management and adherence.

Publisher

AOTA Press

Reference38 articles.

1. Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process;American Occupational Therapy Association;American Journal of Occupational Therapy,2020

2. Measuring medication self-management capacity: A scoping review of available instruments;Badawoud;Drugs and Aging,2020

3. Baum, C. M., & Wolf, T. J. (2013). Executive Function Performance Test.Washington University in St. Louis. https://www.ot.wustl.edu/about/resources/executive-function-performance-test-efpt-308

4. A systematic review of medication adherence thresholds dependent of clinical outcomes;Baumgartner;Frontiers in Pharmacology,2018

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3