Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Satisfaction With Daily Occupations and Occupational Balance in Spanish Stroke Survivors

Author:

de Diego-Alonso Cristina1,Bellosta-López Pablo2,Hultqvist Jenny3,Vidaña-Moya Laura4,Eklund Mona5

Affiliation:

1. Cristina de Diego-Alonso, OT, PT, MSc, is Research and Teaching Staff, MOTUS Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences Research, Department of Physical Therapy, Universidad San Jorge, Campus Universitario, Villanueva de Gállego, Zaragoza, Spain.

2. Pablo Bellosta-López, PT, PhD, is Research and Teaching Staff, MOTUS Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physical Therapy, Universidad San Jorge, Campus Universitario, Villanueva de Gállego, Zaragoza, Spain; pbellosta@usj.es

3. Jenny Hultqvist, OT, PhD, is Senior Lecturer, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

4. Laura Vidaña-Moya, OT, PhD, is Research and Teaching Staff, Research Group Occare, Escola Universitària d’Infermeria i Teràpia Ocupacional de Terrassa, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Terrassa, Spain.

5. Mona Eklund, OT, PhD, is Senior Professor, Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Abstract

Abstract Importance: Stroke survivors experience changes in participation level, satisfaction with participation, and participation balance, making it necessary to have a validated tool for their assessment. Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Satisfaction With Daily Occupations and Occupational Balance (SDO–OB) in stroke survivors. Design: Psychometric study. Setting: National multicenter study (rehabilitation centers, and hospitals). Participants: One hundred forty stroke survivors with and without a primary caregiver. Outcomes and Measures: Participants completed the SDO–OB, the five-level version of the EQ–5D (EQ–5D–5L), and the Activity Card Sort (ACS). Internal consistency, convergent validity, known-groups validity, and floor and ceiling effects were assessed. Intraobserver reliability was assessed 1 wk apart. Results: The internal consistency was acceptable; Cronbach’s α = .80, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.75, 0.85]. A moderate correlation was found between the SDO–OB summed participation level and summed participation satisfaction (ρ = .53). Both SDO–OB summed scores correlated with ACS scores (0.25 < ρ < .61). However, only summed participation satisfaction scores correlated with the emotional component of the EQ–5D–5L (ρ = .32). The SDO–OB discriminated between groups with and without a caregiver (p = .001) and had no floor or ceiling effects (<7%). Good intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were obtained for summed participation level (ICC = .91; 95% CI [.85, .94]) and summed participation satisfaction (ICC = .86; 95% CI [.78, .92]). Standard error of measurement and minimum detectable change were 0.7 and 1.9 points, respectively, for summed participation level and 4.5 and 12.4, respectively, for summed participation satisfaction. Conclusions: The Spanish version of the SDO–OB presented good psychometric properties, making it a suitable instrument to address participation level, participation satisfaction, and participation balance in stroke survivors. Plain-Language Summary: After a stroke, survivors experience changes in their participation in daily activities and how satisfied they are with them. This study examined whether a tool called Satisfaction With Daily Occupations and Occupational Balance (SDO–OB) could provide reliable information about this. We looked at 140 stroke survivors from different places in Spain to see whether they had someone caring for them, how healthy they were, and how their participation in daily activities changed after stroke. We found that the SDO–OB is helpful for understanding a stroke survivor’s situation and can identify areas needing intervention and track changes caused by intervention plans.

Publisher

AOTA Press

Reference54 articles.

1. User’s guide to correlation coefficients;Akoglu;Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine,2018

2. Spanish transcultural adaptation of the Activity Card Sort;Alegre-Muelas;Occupational Therapy International,2019

3. Sample size used to validate a scale: A review of publications on newly-developed patient reported outcomes measures;Anthoine;Health and Quality of Life Outcomes,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3