Development of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination Station for Pediatric Occupational Therapy and an Evaluation of Its Quality

Author:

Fu Chung-Pei1,Chi Hsin-Yu2,Li Ming-Wei3,Liu Chien-Hsiou4,Yeh Jiann-Horng5,Wang Chih-Chia6,Su Chia-Ting7

Affiliation:

1. Chung-Pei Fu, PhD, is Associate Professor, Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

2. Hsin-Yu Chi, BS, is Occupational Therapist, Department of Rehabilitation, Sijhih Cathay General Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

3. Ming-Wei Li, BS, is Occupational Therapist, Department of Rehabilitation, Sijhih Cathay General Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

4. Chien-Hsiou Liu, PhD, is Professor, Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

5. Jiann-Horng Yeh, MD, is Professor, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan, and Professor, Department of Neurology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

6. Chih-Chia Wang, PhD, is Associate Professor, Department of Family Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, and Attending Physician, Department of Family Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.

7. Chia-Ting Su, PhD, is Professor, Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan; chiatingsu@gmail.com

Abstract

Abstract Importance: The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a highly valued measure of students’ clinical competencies in medical education. However, few studies have reported on the administration of the OSCE in pediatric occupational therapy education. Objective: To describe the development of a pediatric occupational therapy OSCE station to evaluate students’ use of a standardized assessment and examine its standard setting, failure rates, and psychometric properties. Design: Prospective, cross-sectional, observational study design. Setting: Three OSCE stations in a university clinical skills center. Participants: Five experienced occupational therapists, 60 examinees, 44 child standardized patients, 44 chaperones, and 15 examiners. Measures: The sum of the rating scale and the global performance scores were used. The rating scale measured the examinee’s clinical competences in administering a standardized assessment. The 5-point global performance score was used to evaluate the examinee’s whole performance. Results: The OCSE station’s expert validity was acceptable (item-level content validity index [CVI] = 0.8–1.0; scale-level CVI = 0.98). Passing scores according to the Angoff method (passing score = 14) and the contrasting-groups M–SD method (passing score = 13) were similar. Failure rates were high (61.7%–73.3%). Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach’s α = .78). No significant examiner effect was found (p = .554), and interexaminer reliability was acceptable (item score = 0.58–1.00; sum of the rating scale score = 0.97; global performance score = 0.79). Conclusions and Relevance: The OSCE station for using a standardized assessment is a reliable and valid measure of students’ interpersonal communication skills and assessment skills. What This Article Adds: The OSCE for education in pediatric occupational therapy is both effective and rigorous.

Funder

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan

Publisher

AOTA Press

Subject

Occupational Therapy

Reference28 articles.

1. Construction of a valid and reliable checklist for Objective Structured Clinical Examination—An example of Brunnstrom motor recovery stage III/IV assessment for cerebral vascular accident;Feng;Journal of Occupational Therapy Association R.O.C.,2016

2. Using children as standardized patients in OSCE in pediatric occupational therapy;Fu;Medical Teacher,2017

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3