Accuracy of closed pleural biopsy in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion

Author:

Báez-Saldaña Renata1,Rumbo-Nava Uriel2,Escobar-Rojas Araceli3,Castillo-González Patricia2,León-Dueñas Santiago2,Aguirre-Pérez Teresa2,Vázquez-Manríquez María Eugenia2

Affiliation:

1. Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, México; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico

2. Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, México

3. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: Previous studies have demonstrated that closed pleural biopsy (CPB) has a sensitivity of less than 60% for diagnosing malignancy. Therefore, controversy has recently emerged regarding the value of CPB as a diagnostic test. Our objective was to assess the accuracy of CPB in diagnosing malignancy in patients with pleural effusion. Methods: This was a prospective 8-year study of individuals who underwent CPB to establish the etiology of pleural effusion. Information on each patient was obtained from anatomopathological reports and medical records. When CPB findings showed malignancy or tuberculosis, the biopsy was considered diagnostic, and that was the definitive diagnosis. In cases in which biopsy histopathological findings were nonspecific, a definitive diagnosis was established on the basis of other diagnostic procedures, such as thoracoscopy, thoracotomy, fiberoptic bronchoscopy, biochemical and cellular measurements in pleural fluid, and/or microbiological tests. The accuracy of CPB was determined with 2 × 2 contingency tables. Results: A total of 1034 biopsies from patients with pleural effusion were studied. Of those, 171 (16.54%) were excluded from the accuracy analysis either because of inadequate samples or insufficient information. The results of the accuracy analysis were as follows: sensitivity, 77%; specificity, 98%; positive predictive value, 99%; negative predictive value, 66%; positive likelihood ratio, 38.5; negative likelihood ratio, 0.23; pre-test probability, 2.13; and post-test probability, 82. Conclusions: CPB is useful in clinical practice as a diagnostic test, because there is an important change from pre-test to post-test probability.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Reference17 articles.

1. Davies RJ Standard pleural biopsy versus CT-guided cutting-needle biopsy for diagnosis of malignant disease in pleural effusions: a randomised controlled trial;Maskell NA;Lancet,2003

2. Pleural controversies image guided biopsy vs. thoracoscopy for undiagnosed pleural effusions?;Dixon G;J Thorac Dis,2015

3. New pleural biopsy needle; preliminary study;Cope C;JAMA,1958

4. A pleural-biopsy punch;Abrams LD;Lancet,1958

5. Pleural controversy closed needle pleural biopsy or thoracoscopy-which first?;Koegelenberg CF;Respirology,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3